* [PATCH] loop: fix I/O error on fsync() in detached loop devices
@ 2020-12-31 16:28 Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2021-01-02 5:13 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira @ 2020-12-31 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: linux-block
There's an I/O error on fsync() in a detached loop device
if it has been previously attached.
The issue is write cache is enabled in the attach path in
loop_configure() but it isn't disabled in the detach path;
thus it remains enabled in the block device regardless of
whether it is attached or not.
Now fsync() can get an I/O request that will just be failed
later in loop_queue_rq() as device's state is not 'Lo_bound'.
So, disable write cache in the detach path.
Test-case:
# DEV=/dev/loop7
# IMG=/tmp/image
# truncate --size 1M $IMG
# losetup $DEV $IMG
# losetup -d $DEV
Before:
# strace -e fsync parted -s $DEV print 2>&1 | grep fsync
fsync(3) = -1 EIO (Input/output error)
Warning: Error fsyncing/closing /dev/loop7: Input/output error
[ 982.529929] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop7, sector 0 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x800 phys_seg 0 prio class 0
After:
# strace -e fsync parted -s $DEV print 2>&1 | grep fsync
fsync(3) = 0
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com>
Co-developed-by: Eric Desrochers <eric.desrochers@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Desrochers <eric.desrochers@canonical.com>
---
drivers/block/loop.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index e5ff328f0917..49517482e061 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -1212,6 +1212,9 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, bool release)
goto out_unlock;
}
+ if (!(lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY) && filp->f_op->fsync)
+ blk_queue_write_cache(lo->lo_queue, false, false);
+
/* freeze request queue during the transition */
blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] loop: fix I/O error on fsync() in detached loop devices
2020-12-31 16:28 [PATCH] loop: fix I/O error on fsync() in detached loop devices Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
@ 2021-01-02 5:13 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-01-05 13:57 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi @ 2021-01-02 5:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira; +Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-block
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com> writes:
> There's an I/O error on fsync() in a detached loop device
> if it has been previously attached.
>
> The issue is write cache is enabled in the attach path in
> loop_configure() but it isn't disabled in the detach path;
> thus it remains enabled in the block device regardless of
> whether it is attached or not.
>
> Now fsync() can get an I/O request that will just be failed
> later in loop_queue_rq() as device's state is not 'Lo_bound'.
>
> So, disable write cache in the detach path.
>
> Test-case:
>
> # DEV=/dev/loop7
>
> # IMG=/tmp/image
> # truncate --size 1M $IMG
>
> # losetup $DEV $IMG
> # losetup -d $DEV
>
> Before:
>
> # strace -e fsync parted -s $DEV print 2>&1 | grep fsync
> fsync(3) = -1 EIO (Input/output error)
> Warning: Error fsyncing/closing /dev/loop7: Input/output error
> [ 982.529929] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop7, sector 0 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x800 phys_seg 0 prio class 0
>
> After:
>
> # strace -e fsync parted -s $DEV print 2>&1 | grep fsync
> fsync(3) = 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com>
> Co-developed-by: Eric Desrochers <eric.desrochers@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Desrochers <eric.desrochers@canonical.com>
This sign-off chain is not sorted correctly. See Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.
Other than that, I think the fix makes sense.
Tested-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/loop.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index e5ff328f0917..49517482e061 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -1212,6 +1212,9 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, bool release)
> goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> + if (!(lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY) && filp->f_op->fsync)
> + blk_queue_write_cache(lo->lo_queue, false, false);
> +
> /* freeze request queue during the transition */
> blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] loop: fix I/O error on fsync() in detached loop devices
2021-01-02 5:13 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
@ 2021-01-05 13:57 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira @ 2021-01-05 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi; +Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-block
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 2:14 AM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
<krisman@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com> writes:
[snip]
> > Signed-off-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Eric Desrochers <eric.desrochers@canonical.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Desrochers <eric.desrochers@canonical.com>
>
> This sign-off chain is not sorted correctly. See Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.
>
> Other than that, I think the fix makes sense.
>
> Tested-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
>
Hey Krisman,
Thanks for testing and catching that; sent V2.
[snip]
> --
> Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
cheers,
--
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-05 13:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-31 16:28 [PATCH] loop: fix I/O error on fsync() in detached loop devices Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2021-01-02 5:13 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-01-05 13:57 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).