public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
To: "John Garry" <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	 "Oliver Mangold" <oliver.mangold@pm.me>,
	 <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: set bi_vcnt when cloning bio
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 12:40:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r03vfpkm.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f4f4fff4-5055-47f7-9f24-6b1780920f4d@oracle.com> (John Garry's message of "Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:40:35 +0000")

"John Garry" <john.g.garry@oracle.com> writes:

> On 15/02/2025 10:58, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>> When cloning a bio, the `bio.bi_vcnt` field is not cloned. This is a
>> problem if users want to perform bounds checks on the `bio.bi_io_vec`
>> field.
>
> Is this fixing a potential problem? Or fixing a real issue?

It is fixing a problem I ran into in rnull, the rust null block
implementation. When running with debug assertions enabled, a bound
check on `bi_io_vec` fails for split bio, because `bio_vcnt` becomes
zero in the cloned bio.

I can work around this by not using a slice type to represent
`bi_io_vec` in rust, not a big deal.

But I am genuinely curious if there is a reason for not setting
`bi_vcnt` during a clone. As far as I can tell, it should be safe to
set. `bi_vcnt` being zero does not seem to have any effect other than to
puzzle developers debugging the code.

Maybe I missed something?


Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg



  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-18 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-15 10:58 [PATCH] block: set bi_vcnt when cloning bio Andreas Hindborg
2025-02-18 10:40 ` John Garry
2025-02-18 11:40   ` Andreas Hindborg [this message]
2025-02-18 17:12     ` John Garry
2025-02-18 18:20       ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-02-18 22:21       ` Bart Van Assche
2025-02-19 14:19         ` John Garry
2025-02-20  6:11 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r03vfpkm.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.mangold@pm.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox