From: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
To: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: cui.tao@linux.dev, axboe@kernel.dk, tj@kernel.org,
josef@toxicpanda.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-throttle: fix divide-by-zero on legacy iops limit of 0
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 20:44:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <882fbac2-bd42-44a7-8fba-b387b3f0fb2b@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260714123754.7a88a65b@pumpkin>
在 2026/7/14 19:37, David Laight 写道:
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 18:35:52 +0800
> Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev> wrote:
>
>> From: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
>>
>> Writing a multiple of 2^32 (e.g. 4294967296) to a legacy cgroup v1
>> throttle iops file (blkio.throttle.{read,write}_iops_device) silently
>> truncates to 0: tg_set_conf() stores the sscanf-parsed u64 value into
>> an unsigned int field with no clamping. The cgroup v2 path,
>> tg_set_limit(), already clamps the same kind of value with
>> min_t(u64, val, UINT_MAX), but the legacy path never did. Note that
>> the "!v -> U64_MAX" mapping only catches an explicit zero and does not
>> catch a value that truncates to zero.
>>
>> With iops stored as 0, tg_update_has_rules() sets has_rules_iops[] and
>> the next IO reaches tg_within_iops_limit(), which computes
>>
>> jiffy_wait = max(jiffy_wait, HZ / iops_limit + 1);
>>
>> triggering a divide-by-zero oops.
>>
>> Fix it in two places:
>>
>> * tg_set_conf(): clamp the value to UINT_MAX, consistent with
>> tg_set_limit(). This closes the truncation root cause (and the
>> general silent truncation for any value above UINT_MAX).
>>
>> * tg_dispatch_iops_time(): treat iops_limit == 0 as unlimited so the
>> divide in tg_within_iops_limit() is never reached, defending
>> against any future path that could produce a zero limit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
>> ---
>> block/blk-throttle.c | 10 ++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-throttle.c b/block/blk-throttle.c
>> index ffc3b70065d4..3f3c1374f4b2 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-throttle.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-throttle.c
>> @@ -883,7 +883,12 @@ static unsigned long tg_dispatch_iops_time(struct throtl_grp *tg, struct bio *bi
>> u32 iops_limit = tg_iops_limit(tg, rw);
>> unsigned long iops_wait;
>>
>> - if (iops_limit == UINT_MAX || tg->flags & THROTL_TG_CANCELING)
>> + /*
>> + * iops_limit == 0 is not a valid limit. Treat it as unlimited so we
>> + * never reach the HZ / iops_limit divide in tg_within_iops_limit().
>> + */
>> + if (iops_limit == UINT_MAX || iops_limit == 0 ||
>> + tg->flags & THROTL_TG_CANCELING)
>> return 0;
>>
>> tg_update_slice(tg, rw);
>> @@ -1386,7 +1391,8 @@ static ssize_t tg_set_conf(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>> if (is_u64)
>> *(u64 *)((void *)tg + of_cft(of)->private) = v;
>> else
>> - *(unsigned int *)((void *)tg + of_cft(of)->private) = v;
>> + *(unsigned int *)((void *)tg + of_cft(of)->private) =
>> + min_t(u64, v, UINT_MAX);
>
> The LHS casts look horrid - there has to be a nicer way to do that.
>
> And you don't need min_t() a plain min() will be fine.
>
Hi David,
Both done in v2 — introduced a void *field local so the writes read
*(u64 *)field / *(unsigned int *)field, and switched to
min(v, (u64)UINT_MAX).
Thanks,
Tao
> David
>
>
>
>>
>> tg_conf_updated(tg, false);
>> ret = 0;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 10:35 [PATCH] blk-throttle: fix divide-by-zero on legacy iops limit of 0 Tao Cui
2026-07-14 11:37 ` David Laight
2026-07-15 12:44 ` Tao Cui [this message]
2026-07-15 15:01 ` David Laight
2026-07-15 16:13 ` Haris Iqbal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=882fbac2-bd42-44a7-8fba-b387b3f0fb2b@linux.dev \
--to=cui.tao@linux.dev \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox