From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v2] block: Fixes for bdi handling
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 15:27:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <88312b29-2a25-a4b9-f747-4c90eb6004a4@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170310102205.GA12421@quack2.suse.cz>
On 03/10/2017 03:22 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 09-03-17 09:41:01, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 03/09/2017 03:16 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> this is a second revision of the series fixing the most urgent bugs that were
>>> introduced by commit 165a5e22fafb "block: Move bdi_unregister() to
>>> del_gendisk()" and by 0dba1314d4f8 "scsi, block: fix duplicate bdi name
>>> registration crashes". In fact before these commits we had a different set of
>>> problems in the code but they were less visible :).
>>
>> It was rather urgent to get those fixes in, so I already sent them off.
>> Not a huge deal, but it would be nice to add the atomic init fix as a
>> separate patch later on.
>
> OK, actually my followup fixes remove the counter completely so I guess we
> can just leave it as is.
Yes, if that's the case, then there's little point in an incremental
cleanup.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-11 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-09 10:16 [PATCH 0/4 v2] block: Fixes for bdi handling Jan Kara
2017-03-09 10:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: Allow bdi re-registration Jan Kara
2017-03-09 16:39 ` Tejun Heo
2017-03-09 10:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] bdi: Fix use-after-free in wb_congested_put() Jan Kara
2017-03-09 10:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] block: Make del_gendisk() safer for disks without queues Jan Kara
2017-03-09 10:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] Revert "scsi, block: fix duplicate bdi name registration crashes" Jan Kara
2017-03-09 16:41 ` [PATCH 0/4 v2] block: Fixes for bdi handling Jens Axboe
2017-03-10 10:22 ` Jan Kara
2017-03-11 22:27 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=88312b29-2a25-a4b9-f747-4c90eb6004a4@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=arthur.marsh@internode.on.net \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox