Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] block: cap atomic write size by PI buffer size constraints
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2026 09:09:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c16f727-c840-4a8f-94a7-fbe09bc3735a@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907074111.721054-3-hch@lst.de>

On 9/7/26 08:40, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> As Sashiko points out, 

Do you have a reference for that? I'm just curious, as we don't support 
atomics for integrity writes. Well, for SCSI we don't... we impose this 
restriction via sd_config_atomic(), I need to check for the same in NVMe...

> limiting the I/O size by the size of the available
> PI buffer can cause inconsistencies for atomic writes.  This also limit
> atomic_write_max_sectors in blk_validate_integrity_limits.
> 
> Fixes: ec7f31b2a2d3 ("block: make bio auto-integrity deadlock safe")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>   block/blk-settings.c | 6 ++++++
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
> index 8274631290db..e469baa1f08b 100644
> --- a/block/blk-settings.c
> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
> @@ -206,6 +206,12 @@ static int blk_validate_integrity_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
>   	lim->max_sectors = min(lim->max_sectors,
>   		max_integrity_io_size(lim) >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
>   
> +	if (lim->features & BLK_FEAT_ATOMIC_WRITES) {
> +		lim->atomic_write_max_sectors =
> +			min(lim->atomic_write_max_sectors,
> +				max_integrity_io_size(lim) >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
> +	}
> +
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-07  8:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-07  7:40 misc block PI / bounce buffering fixes Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-07  7:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: avoid integer overflows in max_integrity_io_size Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-07  7:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: cap atomic write size by PI buffer size constraints Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-07  8:09   ` John Garry [this message]
2026-09-07  8:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-07  9:19       ` John Garry
2026-09-09  2:44         ` Martin K. Petersen
2026-09-09  7:52           ` John Garry
2026-09-09  9:16   ` John Garry
2026-09-10  5:36     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-10  8:45       ` John Garry
2026-09-10 12:52         ` John Garry
2026-09-10 14:43           ` John Garry
2026-09-07  7:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: improve aligning down bios in bio_iov_iter_bounce_write Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-09  2:47 ` misc block PI / bounce buffering fixes Martin K. Petersen (Oracle)
2026-09-11 16:41 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8c16f727-c840-4a8f-94a7-fbe09bc3735a@linux.dev \
    --to=john.garry@linux.dev \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkp@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox