public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>,
	linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] block - ataflop.c: fix breakage introduced at blk-mq refactoring
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 16:30:13 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d60483d-3cd6-5df7-8db6-7a8b9ce462e3@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211018222157.12238-1-schmitzmic@gmail.com>

On 10/18/21 4:21 PM, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Refactoring of the Atari floppy driver when converting to blk-mq
> has broken the state machine in not-so-subtle ways:
> 
> finish_fdc() must be called when operations on the floppy device
> have completed. This is crucial in order to relase the ST-DMA
> lock, which protects against concurrent access to the ST-DMA
> controller by other drivers (some DMA related, most just related
> to device register access - broken beyond compare, I know).
> 
> When rewriting the drivers' old do_request() function, the fact
> that finish_fdc() was called only when all queued requests had
> completed appears to have been overlooked. Instead, the new
> request function calls finish_fdc() immediately after the last
> request has been queued. finish_fdc() executes a dummy seek after
> most requests, and this overwrites the state machine's interrupt
> hander that was set up to wait for completion of the read/write
> request just prior. To make matters worse, finish_fdc() is called
> before device interrupts are re-enabled, making certain that the
> read/write interupt is missed.
> 
> Shifting the finish_fdc() call into the read/write request completion
> handler ensures the driver waits for the request to actually complete.

Was going to ask if this driver was used by anyone, since it's taken 3
years for the breakage to be spotted... In all fairness, it was pretty
horribly broken before the change too (like waiting in request_fn, under
a lock).

So I'm curious, are you actively using it, or was it just an exercise in
curiosity?

> Testing this change, I've only ever seen single sector requests with the
> 'last' flag set. If there is a way to send requests to the driver
> without that flag set, I'd appreciate a hint. As it now stands,
> the driver won't release the ST-DMA lock on requests that don't have
> this flag set, but won't accept further requests because the attempt
> to acquire the already-held lock once more will fail.

'last' is set if it's the last of a sequence of ->queue_rq() calls. If
you just do sync IO, then last is always set, as there is no sequence.
It's not hard to generate sequences, but on a floppy with basically no
queue depth the most you'd ever get is 2. You could try and set:

/sys/block/<dev>/queue/max_sectors_kb

to 4 for example, and then do something that generates a larger than 4k
write or read. Ideally that should give you more than 1.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-18 22:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-18 22:21 [PATCH RFC] block - ataflop.c: fix breakage introduced at blk-mq refactoring Michael Schmitz
2021-10-18 22:30 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2021-10-18 22:51   ` Finn Thain
2021-10-18 23:07     ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-18 23:17       ` Finn Thain
2021-10-18 23:28         ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-19  0:14           ` Finn Thain
2021-10-19  0:41             ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-18 23:35   ` Michael Schmitz
2021-10-18 23:40     ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-19  0:42       ` Michael Schmitz
2021-10-19  0:44         ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-18 23:55     ` Omar Sandoval

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8d60483d-3cd6-5df7-8db6-7a8b9ce462e3@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox