From: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
To: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests] zbd/005: Limit block size to zone length
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 01:23:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d8fa127-3bf8-c6b2-71e6-90ce5abcc3df@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aAuSYhnxwpJns5Cs@infradead.org>
On 4/25/25 09:47, hch@infradead.org wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 12:04:39AM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> and in userspace that assumes 512-byte granularity. But there is no
>> such deeply-ingrained assumption for zones. You just have to set the
>> parameter correctly.
>
> There are everywhere in software actually using zones. You still
> haven't answered whay your intended use case is, btw.
I'm working on testing... I thought I would send a few bug fixes upstream in advance...
who knew I would get such a hostile response
>> Plus, smaller zones are more efficient at reducing write amplification,
>> in the same way as smaller block sizes.
>
> No, they aren't. If you zones are only a few kb you will waste a lot
> of effort to actually track their state.
The state is perhaps 4-8 bytes at most? And in any case it's proportional to
the number of zones. If you have a smaller drive you will naturally have smaller zones.
--Sean
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-26 5:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-23 16:49 [PATCH blktests] zbd/005: Limit block size to zone length Sean Anderson
2025-04-24 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-24 11:30 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2025-04-24 13:56 ` Sean Anderson
2025-04-24 14:06 ` hch
2025-04-24 14:20 ` Sean Anderson
2025-04-24 14:23 ` hch
2025-04-25 4:04 ` Sean Anderson
2025-04-25 13:47 ` hch
2025-04-26 5:23 ` Sean Anderson [this message]
2025-04-27 3:23 ` Keith Busch
2025-04-25 2:37 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d8fa127-3bf8-c6b2-71e6-90ce5abcc3df@gmail.com \
--to=seanga2@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox