linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>,
	Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ublk: fix deadlock when reading partition table
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 12:49:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8dd3c141-3e92-44f3-91e2-2bf4827b36a4@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251212143415.485359-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

On 12/12/25 7:34 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index df9831783a13..38f138f248e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> @@ -1080,12 +1080,20 @@ static inline struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu *ublk_get_uring_cmd_pdu(
>  	return io_uring_cmd_to_pdu(ioucmd, struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu);
>  }
>  
> +static void ublk_end_request(struct request *req, blk_status_t error)
> +{
> +	local_bh_disable();
> +	blk_mq_end_request(req, error);
> +	local_bh_enable();
> +}

This is really almost too ugly to live, as a work-around for what just
happens to be in __fput_deferred()... Surely we can come up with
something better here? Heck even a PF_ flag would be better than this,
imho.

> @@ -1117,14 +1125,26 @@ static inline void __ublk_complete_rq(struct request *req, struct ublk_io *io,
>  	if (unlikely(unmapped_bytes < io->res))
>  		io->res = unmapped_bytes;
>  
> -	if (blk_update_request(req, BLK_STS_OK, io->res))
> +	/*
> +	 * Run bio->bi_end_io() from softirq context for preventing this
> +	 * ublk's blkdev_release() from being called on current's task
> +	 * work, see fput() implementation.

But that's not what it does, running it from softirq context. It simply
disables local bottomhalf interrupts to trick __fput_deferred(), it's
not scheduling ->bi_end_io() to run from softirq context itself.

-- 
Jens Axboe

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-12 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-12 14:34 [PATCH V2] ublk: fix deadlock when reading partition table Ming Lei
2025-12-12 16:57 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-12-12 19:49 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-12-13  2:28   ` Ming Lei
2025-12-14  6:41     ` Jens Axboe
2025-12-16  8:56       ` Ming Lei
2025-12-16 15:03         ` Jens Axboe
2025-12-16 17:57           ` Jens Axboe
2025-12-17  3:09             ` Ming Lei
2025-12-17  3:19               ` Jens Axboe
2025-12-17  3:33                 ` Ming Lei
2025-12-18  2:37                   ` Jens Axboe
2025-12-18  2:41 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8dd3c141-3e92-44f3-91e2-2bf4827b36a4@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=csander@purestorage.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).