public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, hch@lst.de, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] nvme fixes for 6.19, final
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 08:55:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <91c3fbcd-dd8c-4633-96c4-9b60022cb857@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aYS9KeAYcTh9GIaJ@kbusch-mbp>

On 2/5/26 8:54 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 08:49:35AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2/5/26 8:47 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 2/5/26 8:38 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
>>>> Hi Jens,
>>>>
>>>> Some late fixes for nvme that should go in this release. One for a pci
>>>> regression that causes a kernel panic during certain dma conditions. The
>>>> other fixes a vulnerability in the tcp target.
>>>>
>>>> The following changes since commit 4da7c5c3ec34d839bba6e035c3d05c447a2f9d4f:
>>>>
>>>>   bcache: fix I/O accounting leak in detached_dev_do_request (2026-01-28 19:06:55 -0700)
>>>>
>>>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>>>
>>>>   git://git.infradead.org/nvme.git tags/nvme-6.19-2026-02-05
>>>>
>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 52a0a98549344ca20ad81a4176d68d28e3c05a5c:
>>>>
>>>>   nvmet-tcp: add bounds checks in nvmet_tcp_build_pdu_iovec (2026-02-05 07:29:10 -0800)
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> nvme fixes for Linux 6.19
>>>>
>>>>  - Fix NULL pointer access setting up dma mappings (Keith)
>>>>  - Fix invalid memory access from malformed TCP PDU (YunJe)
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Keith Busch (1):
>>>>       nvme-pci: handle changing device dma map requirements
>>>
>>> After this one, iod in nvme_pci_prp_iter_next() is now unused, which
>>> will trigger a compiler warning...
>>
>> Actually this is only true in the 7.0 based branches. Should be fine
>> for 6.19, I'll add a commit for the 7.0 merge.
> 
> Yeah, I initially applied this to 7.0 with it removed, but we decided
> this was a nasty and easy to hit bug that 6.19 is better of having fixed
> on release. I had to leave the 'iod' in for the 6.19 port, so looks like
> we'll have a merge conflict for the next cycle.

It actually merges cleanly, but you then end up with that leftover
iod. If it hadn't merged cleanly, I would've seen it before building
it :-)

-- 
Jens Axboe


      reply	other threads:[~2026-02-05 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-05 15:38 [GIT PULL] nvme fixes for 6.19, final Keith Busch
2026-02-05 15:47 ` Jens Axboe
2026-02-05 15:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-05 15:51     ` Jens Axboe
2026-02-05 15:49   ` Jens Axboe
2026-02-05 15:54     ` Keith Busch
2026-02-05 15:55       ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=91c3fbcd-dd8c-4633-96c4-9b60022cb857@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox