From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
snitzer@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk,
martin.petersen@oracle.com,
james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 0/8] Use block pr_ops in LIO
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2022 21:01:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <923053d3-adf8-e4b4-9ef3-8e920ae90a79@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220603065536.5641-1-michael.christie@oracle.com>
On 6/2/22 23:55, Mike Christie wrote:
> The following patches were built over Linus's tree. They allow us to use
> the block pr_ops with LIO's target_core_iblock module to support cluster
> applications in VMs.
>
> Currently, to use something like windows clustering in VMs with LIO and
> vhost-scsi, you have to use tcmu or pscsi or use a cluster aware
> FS/framework for the LIO pr file. Setting up a cluster FS/framework is
> pain and waste when your real backend device is already a distributed
> device, and pscsi and tcmu are nice for specific use cases, but iblock
> gives you the best performance and allows you to use stacked devices
> like dm-multipath. So these patches allow iblock to work like pscsi/tcmu
> where they can pass a PR command to the backend module. And then iblock
> will use the pr_ops to pass the PR command to the real devices similar
> to what we do for unmap today.
>
> Note that this is patchset does not attempt to support every PR SCSI
> feature in iblock. It has the same limitations as tcmu and pscsi where
> you can have a single I_T nexus per device and only supports what is
> needed for windows clustering right now.
How has this patch series been tested? Does LIO pass the libiscsi
persistent reservation tests with this patch series applied?
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-05 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-03 6:55 [PATCH 0/8] Use block pr_ops in LIO Mike Christie
2022-06-03 6:55 ` [PATCH 01/11] scsi: target: Rename sbc_ops to exec_cmd_ops Mike Christie
2022-06-20 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-03 6:55 ` [PATCH 02/11] scsi: Rename sd_pr_command Mike Christie
2022-06-20 7:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-03 6:55 ` [PATCH 03/11] scsi: Move sd_pr_type to header to share Mike Christie
2022-06-05 3:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-06-20 7:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-03 6:55 ` [PATCH 04/11] block: Add PR callouts for read keys and reservation Mike Christie
2022-06-20 7:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-03 6:55 ` [PATCH 05/11] scsi: Add support for block PR read keys/reservation Mike Christie
2022-06-03 6:55 ` [PATCH 06/11] dm: " Mike Christie
2022-06-03 6:55 ` [PATCH 07/11] scsi: target: Allow backends to hook into PR handling Mike Christie
2022-06-20 7:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-03 6:55 ` [PATCH 08/11] scsi: target: Add block PR support to iblock Mike Christie
2022-06-20 7:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-03 6:55 ` [PATCH 09/11] block, nvme: Add error for reservation conflicts Mike Christie
2022-06-03 19:45 ` Keith Busch
2022-06-03 23:08 ` Mike Christie
2022-06-04 7:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-06-04 17:13 ` michael.christie
2022-06-05 9:42 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-06-20 7:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-05 4:00 ` [dm-devel] " Bart Van Assche
2022-06-03 6:55 ` [PATCH 10/11] scsi: Use BLK_STS_RSV_CONFLICT " Mike Christie
2022-06-03 6:55 ` [PATCH 11/11] scsi: target: Handle BLK_STS_RSV_CONFLICT Mike Christie
2022-06-03 11:46 ` [PATCH 0/8] Use block pr_ops in LIO Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-03 17:55 ` Mike Christie
2022-06-20 7:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-05 4:01 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2022-06-05 16:55 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Christie
2022-06-05 18:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-06-06 16:38 ` Mike Christie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=923053d3-adf8-e4b4-9ef3-8e920ae90a79@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).