From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/10] block, scsi, md: Improve suspend and resume To: Bart Van Assche Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "hch@lst.de" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "oleksandr@natalenko.name" , "martin.petersen@oracle.com" , "ming.lei@redhat.com" References: <20171017232630.4264-1-bart.vanassche@wdc.com> <9c33db06-39e7-fd61-f146-4ae6df4302b5@kernel.dk> <1508283619.3457.24.camel@wdc.com> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <94c627b3-fd59-a669-5ea0-0c4afdc7b2d3@kernel.dk> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:47:26 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1508283619.3457.24.camel@wdc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-ID: On 10/17/2017 05:40 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 17:28 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 10/17/2017 05:26 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >>> It is known that during the resume following a hibernate, especially when >>> using an md RAID1 array created on top of SCSI devices, sometimes the system >>> hangs instead of coming up properly. This patch series fixes that >>> problem. These patches have been tested on top of the block layer for-next >>> branch. Please consider these changes for kernel v4.15. >> >> The folks that had trouble with this issue, have they tested the >> patchset? I'd like to get a solution queued up for this sooner rather >> than later, but I'd greatly prefer if we had some folks that have >> tested and verified it. > > Hello Jens, > > Previous versions of this series have been tested by the two reporters of > this issue (Oleksandr Natalenko and Martin Steigerwald). I think this version > is close enough to what has been tested by Oleksandr and Martin for their > test results still to be valid. See also: > * https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-block@vger.kernel.org/msg13930.html > * https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-block@vger.kernel.org/msg14389.html OK good. Can we add their tested-by then? -- Jens Axboe