From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Martin Steigerwald To: Ming Lei Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shaohua Li Subject: Re: I/O hangs after resuming from suspend-to-ram Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 19:33:00 +0200 Message-ID: <9658713.A4bv0G9Yjl@merkaba> In-Reply-To: <20170920221703.GA5105@ming.t460p> References: <3926917.BCSovyVWdL@natalenko.name> <2260365.vTb2K2ZmgF@merkaba> <20170920221703.GA5105@ming.t460p> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-ID: Ming Lei - 21.09.17, 06:17: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 07:25:02PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Ming Lei - 28.08.17, 21:32: > > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 03:10:35PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > > > Ming Lei - 28.08.17, 20:58: > > > > > On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 09:43:52AM +0200, Oleksandr Natalenko wro= te: > > > > > > Hi. > >=20 > > > > > > Here is disk setup for QEMU VM: > > [=E2=80=A6] > >=20 > > > > > > In words: 2 virtual disks, RAID10 setup with far-2 layout, LUKS= on > > > > > > it, > > > > > > then > > > > > > LVM, then ext4 for boot, swap and btrfs for /. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > I couldn't reproduce the issue with single disk without RAID. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Could you verify if the following patch fixes your issue? > > > >=20 > > > > Could this also apply to non MD RAID systems? I am using BTRFS RAID > > > > 1 with two SSDs. So far with CFQ it runs stable. > > >=20 > > > It is for fixing Oleksandr's issue wrt. blk-mq, and looks not for you. > >=20 > > My findings are different: > >=20 > > On 4.12.10 with CONFIG_HZ=3D1000, CONFIG_PREEMPT=3Dy and optimizations = for > > Intel Core/newer Xeon I see this: > >=20 > > 1) Running with CFQ: No hang after resume > >=20 > > 2) Running with scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=3D1 + BFQ: Hang after resume within > > first 1-2 days. >=20 > Hi Martin, >=20 > Thanks for your report! >=20 > Could you test the following patchset to see if it fixes your issue? >=20 > https://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-block&m=3D150579298505484&w=3D2 Testing with https://github.com/ming1/linux.git, my_v4.13-safe-scsi- quiesce_V5_for_test branch as of 53954fd58fb9fe6894b1635dad1acec96ca51a2f I= =20 now have a bit more than three days and 8 hours of uptime without a hang on= =20 resume from memory or disk, despite using blk-mq + BFQ. So it looks like this patch set fixes the issue for me. To say for sure I= =C2=B4d say=20 some more days of testing are needed. But it looks like the hang on resume = is=20 fixed by this patch set. Thanks, =2D-=20 Martin