Linux block layer
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@hgst.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, hare@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Fix front merge check
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 21:38:43 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9cc4fbbe-4cdd-d9b0-41ca-5dcb13cc6409@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a365634-e2e7-45d9-a86d-10894212a4d2@hgst.com>



On 07/13/2016 07:23 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>
> Jens,
>
> On 7/14/16 01:19, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 07/12/2016 10:23 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> For a front merge, the maximum number of sectors of the
>>> request must be checked against the front merge BIO sector,
>>> not the current sector of the request.
>>
>> Why does this matter? The merging should only happen before we start the
>> request, hence rq pos and first bio should be one and the same.
>
> The block device of SMR drives is set up as chunked with the chunk size
> equal to the drive zone size. Since write requests directed to
> sequential zones cannot cross zone boundaries, both the front merge code
> and the back merge code must ensure that requests resulting from a merge
> do not cross chunk boundaries.
>
> The back merge code does this well, but the front merge code fails to
> prevent merging when the BIO is the last write in a zone and the request
> is the first write in the following (empty) zone. The check against the
> request LBA does not prevent the merge as the request+bio size fit in
> the empty zone. The check must be against the BIO LBA to detect the
> chunk boundary crossing.

Ah that makes sense, it's on adding the new bio, not against the 
existing rq->bio. Applied for 4.8.

-- 
Jens Axboe

      reply	other threads:[~2016-07-21  3:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-13  5:23 [PATCH] block: Fix front merge check Damien Le Moal
2016-07-13  5:42 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-07-13 16:19 ` Jens Axboe
2016-07-14  1:23   ` Damien Le Moal
2016-07-21  3:38     ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9cc4fbbe-4cdd-d9b0-41ca-5dcb13cc6409@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@hgst.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox