From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7255EC433EF for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 18:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233019AbiCCSVj (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2022 13:21:39 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52114 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231206AbiCCSVj (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2022 13:21:39 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x82b.google.com (mail-qt1-x82b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F70D1A39D5 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2022 10:20:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id bc10so5350190qtb.5 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 10:20:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dubeyko-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=lOWE+vv2CjWtv52sjslTIrPdvLmSb134lQ2+RFnBpR4=; b=MhTJyU01QczY/LwLvmt7UrfJTjMWAk74YIHpljwbr+nP4WseipiqGLvr/6dRm1EEsI kjy5IGnkDBvSOYouoXh0goSyxYLGU7wOhbzL5IPnrhsvI/SMOVRf5YeFuZdoBheFfCGD +9Mwymg1Att9JIl/+rO5+9pvcMleOWimuUvN/i5qwPwj7AQ0yvx7GtumaqRC3eG4RDVG 81FYrYTEumIcSXDf9VWmt1aFD3NxP0QDCDWbctEggl7FMyqdi7wD0bb0taqpx2Q0fE/p jAnJGQU58B55jYH6DBSD5NdkjdUxsfLLUAiyrfBSJGVya4sysunyhR+jVXSyucl5CN04 33CQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=lOWE+vv2CjWtv52sjslTIrPdvLmSb134lQ2+RFnBpR4=; b=0cA76jzViK3TNvQGNChojwsDpR6r/cmqLtYkT4gPfsMjFb8zmX7d4LhyjhxkuvoeoF D/rG9D4l1fm0F4USI58Pvd+IQ0lthoYtv9xUcqAMFnTh5ptoeMUkapbhQhpJqsZMO/Fo eBQQnbRTJm8XgR2Q6wx/UrTnEi1udOZP4Q9MJE2OMWi/u0amVhnPwtjs1OnqMPAniWQP QjPwky/3S868khr4C/ILgCCTmtmTXiCLDnrusSBzsDFoP5jfB54tPlZcKDTFG/TaPXy7 y1/oFOgu+18dyPsu11GhQO/3jK7z71k8Yx8tgsqZKMATuFfj+K3oxhaOiBfYDAlP8Bax 0V6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530LtsT2OKEqvt5cuxiV4gCG+gPbyXl6L+4EfS4mTcI7b9NQf0tt BWfd1Ak4aM1P+ZlJXuCZONvq/w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzm5iGlfQVNOahtI+69DmjFphyvsKWFCsPrYX9EScs1/xOKAbe5P0ZblV3BNmFPqXylz02wAA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5d89:0:b0:2df:f357:c681 with SMTP id d9-20020ac85d89000000b002dff357c681mr21790120qtx.475.1646331652660; Thu, 03 Mar 2022 10:20:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:1700:42f0:6600:189c:9f41:ca51:5672]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b137-20020ae9eb8f000000b00648f9736ab0sm1346633qkg.124.2022.03.03.10.20.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Mar 2022 10:20:51 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 15.0 \(3693.60.0.1.1\)) Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF BoF] BoF for Zoned Storage From: Viacheslav Dubeyko In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 10:20:46 -0800 Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Linux FS Devel , lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org, =?utf-8?Q?Matias_Bj=C3=B8rling?= , =?utf-8?Q?Javier_Gonz=C3=A1lez?= , Damien Le Moal , Bart Van Assche , Adam Manzanares , Keith Busch , Johannes Thumshirn , Naohiro Aota , Pankaj Raghav , Kanchan Joshi , Nitesh Shetty , "Viacheslav A. Dubeyko" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Luis Chamberlain X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3693.60.0.1.1) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org > On Mar 2, 2022, at 4:56 PM, Luis Chamberlain = wrote: >=20 > Thinking proactively about LSFMM, regarding just Zone storage.. >=20 > I'd like to propose a BoF for Zoned Storage. The point of it is > to address the existing point points we have and take advantage of > having folks in the room we can likely settle on things faster which > otherwise would take years. >=20 > I'll throw at least one topic out: >=20 > * Raw access for zone append for microbenchmarks: > - are we really happy with the status quo? > - if not what outlets do we have? >=20 > I think the nvme passthrogh stuff deserves it's own shared > discussion though and should not make it part of the BoF. >=20 > Luis I am working on zone-aware file system. So, I would be really happy to = participate. Thanks, Slava.