From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C74EC43217 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229712AbiKUJAA (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2022 04:00:00 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50366 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229446AbiKUI77 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Nov 2022 03:59:59 -0500 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9978CDF95; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 00:59:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 463F61F897; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 08:59:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1669021197; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=v9eI0l3L5J3waSLvW+eC332jj5gD4Rcqx/oy4092T7U=; b=uJNWoBaxwvTkrgcPCkmSH5N8lmksBFO6vBhMcKeC2W7lOUh2gTFKNUCWjI6fbYlxpP4bPc FekS8LKjm1E6B5wm3peAwXuznfWm6rE2l2WmGEaZSqIF05/CrJqQtHQvIhenohiltd0lPR V2J68v0dm4icKuYkLMj6IUjdDe79bbc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1669021197; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=v9eI0l3L5J3waSLvW+eC332jj5gD4Rcqx/oy4092T7U=; b=mwKTVaxEkEJfXDxmby4hh4uyjgP5plQNW4zg0K0s18PEbBjnSvse2OmeQrilKUMTFtMoFK tjiy0rAVGrz7aCDA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0E0D1376E; Mon, 21 Nov 2022 08:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id BGsKOQw+e2MxXQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 21 Nov 2022 08:59:56 +0000 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 09:59:55 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Li Wang Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it, Jens Axboe , Minchan Kim , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, OGAWA Hirofumi , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky , Nitin Gupta Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 1/1] zram01.sh: Workaround division by 0 on vfat on ppc64le Message-ID: Reply-To: Petr Vorel References: <20221107191136.18048-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20221107191136.18048-2-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Hi Li, > Hi Petr, > On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 3:12 AM Petr Vorel wrote: > > Repeatedly read /sys/block/zram*/mm_stat for 1 sec. This should fix bug > > on ppc64le on stable kernels, where mem_used_total is often 0. > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel > > --- > > .../kernel/device-drivers/zram/zram01.sh | 27 +++++++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/device-drivers/zram/zram01.sh > > b/testcases/kernel/device-drivers/zram/zram01.sh > > index 58d233f91..76a8ccab4 100755 > > --- a/testcases/kernel/device-drivers/zram/zram01.sh > > +++ b/testcases/kernel/device-drivers/zram/zram01.sh > > @@ -105,6 +105,26 @@ zram_mount() > > tst_res TPASS "mount of zram device(s) succeeded" > > } > > +read_mem_used_total() > > +{ > > + echo $(awk '{print $3}' $1) > > +} > > + > > +# Reads /sys/block/zram*/mm_stat until mem_used_total is not 0. > > +loop_read_mem_used_total() > This is not a looping function to check if mem_used_total is equal to zero, > the loop part is by means of the TST_RETRY_FUNC macro. Thanks for your review! > So, I'd suggest renaming it to check_read_mem_used_total(). Agree. Unfortunately even this didn't help on ppc64le system where I was able to reproduce it, thus probably not worth to merge. Unfortunately later I was not able to reproduce the problem any more, I'll try it more this week. Kind regards, Petr > Reviewed-by: Li Wang > > +{ > > + local file="$1" > > + local mem_used_total > > + > > + tst_res TINFO "$file" > > + cat $file >&2 > > + > > + mem_used_total=$(read_mem_used_total $file) > > + [ "$mem_used_total" -eq 0 ] && return 1 > > + > > + return 0 > > +} > > + > > zram_fill_fs() > > { > > local mem_used_total > > @@ -133,9 +153,12 @@ zram_fill_fs() > > continue > > fi > > - mem_used_total=`awk '{print $3}' > > "/sys/block/zram$i/mm_stat"` > > + TST_RETRY_FUNC "loop_read_mem_used_total > > /sys/block/zram$i/mm_stat" 0 > > + mem_used_total=$(read_mem_used_total > > /sys/block/zram$i/mm_stat) > > + tst_res TINFO "mem_used_total: $mem_used_total" > > + > > v=$((100 * 1024 * $b / $mem_used_total)) > > - r=`echo "scale=2; $v / 100 " | bc` > > + r=$(echo "scale=2; $v / 100 " | bc) > > if [ "$v" -lt 100 ]; then > > tst_res TFAIL "compression ratio: $r:1" > > -- > > 2.38.0 > > -- > > Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp