From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
ming.lei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 6/6] ublk_drv: add mechanism for supporting unprivileged ublk device
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 16:19:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7U2mshx9s9rx++C@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a62ze4ql.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 01:35:14PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> I have one quick question...
>
> Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > In case of UBLK_F_UNPRIVILEGED_DEV:
> >
> > 1) for command UBLK_CMD_ADD_DEV, it is always allowed, and user needs
> > to provide owner's uid/gid in this command, so that udev can set correct
> > ownership for the created ublk device, since the device owner uid/gid
> > can be queried via command of UBLK_CMD_GET_DEV_INFO.
>
> Why do you have the user provide the uid/gid rather than just using the
> user's credentials directly? It seems a bit strange to me to let
> unprivileged users create devices with arbitrary ownership. What am I
> missing here?
It is one good question.
The original idea is to allow user A to create device for another user
B, and it still depends on user A's capability, such as, if the created
daemon can open the created device which is owned by user B actually.
The above behavior may be extended in future if there is such
requirement. I will switch to just allow to create device for the
current user in V4, then we can start with this easy/simple model.
BTW, that is exactly the current userspace implementation, only the
current uid/gid is passed.
https://github.com/ming1/ubdsrv/tree/unprivileged-ublk
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-04 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-07 12:32 [PATCH V3 0/6] ublk_drv: add mechanism for supporting unprivileged ublk device Ming Lei
2022-12-07 12:33 ` [PATCH V3 1/6] ublk_drv: remove nr_aborted_queues from ublk_device Ming Lei
2022-12-07 12:33 ` [PATCH V3 2/6] ublk_drv: don't probe partitions if the ubq daemon isn't trusted Ming Lei
2022-12-07 12:33 ` [PATCH V3 3/6] ublk_drv: move ublk_get_device_from_id into ublk_ctrl_uring_cmd Ming Lei
2022-12-07 12:33 ` [PATCH V3 4/6] ublk_drv: add device parameter UBLK_PARAM_TYPE_DEVT Ming Lei
2022-12-07 12:33 ` [PATCH V3 5/6] ublk_drv: add module parameter of ublks_max for limiting max allowed ublk dev Ming Lei
2022-12-07 12:33 ` [PATCH V3 6/6] ublk_drv: add mechanism for supporting unprivileged ublk device Ming Lei
2023-01-03 20:35 ` Jonathan Corbet
2023-01-04 8:19 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-12-12 3:59 ` [PATCH V3 0/6] " Ming Lei
2022-12-14 17:54 ` Jens Axboe
2022-12-15 0:35 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y7U2mshx9s9rx++C@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox