public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Khazhy Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>,
	Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] blk-mq: complete request locally if the completion is from tagset iterator
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 17:00:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YIfSr5JTMexUSGL6@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YIe4CzfUDX4yCCNO@T590>

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 03:06:51PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 07:30:51PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 4/26/21 6:45 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> > > index 100fa44d52a6..773aea4db90c 100644
> > > --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> > > +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> > > @@ -284,8 +284,11 @@ static bool bt_tags_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
> > >  	if ((iter_data->flags & BT_TAG_ITER_STARTED) &&
> > >  	    !blk_mq_request_started(rq))
> > >  		ret = true;
> > > -	else
> > > +	else {
> > > +		rq->rq_flags |= RQF_ITERATING;
> > >  		ret = iter_data->fn(rq, iter_data->data, reserved);
> > > +		rq->rq_flags &= ~RQF_ITERATING;
> > > +	}
> > >  	if (!iter_static_rqs)
> > >  		blk_mq_put_rq_ref(rq);
> > >  	return ret;
> > 
> > All existing rq->rq_flags modifications are serialized. The above change
> > adds code that may change rq_flags concurrently with regular request
> > processing. I think that counts as a race condition.
> 
> Good catch, but we still can change .rq_flags via atomic op, such as:
> 
> 	do {
> 		old = rq->rq_flags;
> 		new = old | RQF_ITERATING;
> 	} while (cmpxchg(&rq->rq_flags, old, new) != old);

oops, this way can't work because other .rq_flags modification still may
clear RQF_ITERATING.

As I mentioned in another thread, blk-mq needn't to consider the double
completion[1] any more, which is covered by driver. blk-mq just needs to
make sure that valid request is passed to ->fn(), and it is driver's
responsibility to avoid double completion.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/YIdWz8C5eklPvEiV@T590/T/#u


Thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-27  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-27  1:45 [PATCH V2 0/3] blk-mq: fix request UAF related with iterating over tagset requests Ming Lei
2021-04-27  1:45 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] blk-mq: grab rq->refcount before calling ->fn in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter Ming Lei
2021-04-27  2:28   ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-27  2:45     ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27  1:45 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] blk-mq: complete request locally if the completion is from tagset iterator Ming Lei
2021-04-27  2:30   ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-27  7:06     ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27  9:00       ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-04-27 14:53       ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-27  1:45 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] blk-mq: clear stale request in tags->rq[] before freeing one request pool Ming Lei
2021-04-27  2:34   ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YIfSr5JTMexUSGL6@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=djeffery@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=khazhy@google.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox