From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Khazhy Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>,
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] blk-mq: clear stale request in tags->rq[] before freeing one request pool
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 23:24:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YIl+K0p0jzE/ilo0@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210428143013.GA31155@redhat>
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:30:13AM -0400, David Jeffery wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:10:58PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >
> > refcount_inc_not_zero() in bt_tags_iter() still may read one freed
> > request.
> >
> > Fix the issue by the following approach:
> >
> > 1) hold a per-tags spinlock when reading ->rqs[tag] and calling
> > refcount_inc_not_zero in bt_tags_iter()
> >
>
> This method of closing the race still in my original patch is very nice.
> It's a great improvement.
>
> > 2) clearing stale request referred via ->rqs[tag] before freeing
> > request pool, the per-tags spinlock is held for clearing stale
> > ->rq[tag]
> >
> > So after we cleared stale requests, bt_tags_iter() won't observe
> > freed request any more, also the clearing will wait for pending
> > request reference.
> >
> > The idea of clearing ->rqs[] is borrowed from John Garry's previous
> > patch and one recent David's patch.
> >
>
> However, when you took my original cmpxchg patch and merged my separate
> function to do the cmpxchg cleaning into blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping, you
> missed why it was a separate function. Your patch will clean out the
> static_rqs requests which are being freed, but it doesn't clean out the
> special flush request that gets allocated individually by a
> request_queue. The flush request can be put directly into the rqs[]
> array so it also needs to be cleaned when a request_queue is being
> torn down. This was the second caller of my separated cleaning function.
It can be covered just in one calling of the cleaning function,
see the following patch:
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
index e1e997af89a0..fb9eeb03d6a0 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -500,7 +500,8 @@ static void blk_mq_sched_free_tags(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
unsigned int flags = set->flags & ~BLK_MQ_F_TAG_HCTX_SHARED;
if (hctx->sched_tags) {
- blk_mq_free_rqs(set, hctx->sched_tags, hctx_idx);
+ blk_mq_free_rqs(set, hctx->sched_tags, hctx_idx,
+ hctx->fq->flush_rq);
blk_mq_free_rq_map(hctx->sched_tags, flags);
hctx->sched_tags = NULL;
}
@@ -611,7 +612,8 @@ void blk_mq_sched_free_requests(struct request_queue *q)
queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
if (hctx->sched_tags)
- blk_mq_free_rqs(q->tag_set, hctx->sched_tags, i);
+ blk_mq_free_rqs(q->tag_set, hctx->sched_tags, i,
+ hctx->fq->flush_rq);
}
}
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index 9329b94a9743..757e0e652ce7 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -277,9 +277,15 @@ static bool bt_tags_iter(struct sbitmap *bitmap, unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
if (iter_static_rqs)
rq = tags->static_rqs[bitnr];
else {
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&tags->lock, flags);
rq = tags->rqs[bitnr];
- if (!rq || !refcount_inc_not_zero(&rq->ref))
+ if (!rq || !refcount_inc_not_zero(&rq->ref)) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tags->lock, flags);
return true;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tags->lock, flags);
}
if ((iter_data->flags & BT_TAG_ITER_STARTED) &&
!blk_mq_request_started(rq))
@@ -526,6 +532,7 @@ struct blk_mq_tags *blk_mq_init_tags(unsigned int total_tags,
tags->nr_tags = total_tags;
tags->nr_reserved_tags = reserved_tags;
+ spin_lock_init(&tags->lock);
if (blk_mq_is_sbitmap_shared(flags))
return tags;
@@ -586,7 +593,8 @@ int blk_mq_tag_update_depth(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
return -ENOMEM;
}
- blk_mq_free_rqs(set, *tagsptr, hctx->queue_num);
+ blk_mq_free_rqs(set, *tagsptr, hctx->queue_num,
+ hctx->fq->flush_rq);
blk_mq_free_rq_map(*tagsptr, flags);
*tagsptr = new;
} else {
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.h b/block/blk-mq-tag.h
index 7d3e6b333a4a..f942a601b5ef 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.h
@@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ struct blk_mq_tags {
struct request **rqs;
struct request **static_rqs;
struct list_head page_list;
+
+ /* used to clear rqs[] before one request pool is freed */
+ spinlock_t lock;
};
extern struct blk_mq_tags *blk_mq_init_tags(unsigned int nr_tags,
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 4bd6c11bd8bc..686f6b210114 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2291,8 +2291,42 @@ blk_qc_t blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
return BLK_QC_T_NONE;
}
+static size_t order_to_size(unsigned int order)
+{
+ return (size_t)PAGE_SIZE << order;
+}
+
+/* called before freeing request pool in @tags */
+static void blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
+ struct blk_mq_tags *tags, unsigned int hctx_idx,
+ struct request *flush_rq)
+{
+ struct blk_mq_tags *drv_tags = set->tags[hctx_idx];
+ struct page *page;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&drv_tags->lock, flags);
+ list_for_each_entry(page, &tags->page_list, lru) {
+ unsigned long start = (unsigned long)page_address(page);
+ unsigned long end = start + order_to_size(page->private);
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < set->queue_depth; i++) {
+ struct request *rq = drv_tags->rqs[i];
+ unsigned long rq_addr = (unsigned long)rq;
+
+ if ((rq_addr >= start && rq_addr < end) ||
+ rq == flush_rq) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(refcount_read(&rq->ref) != 0);
+ cmpxchg(&drv_tags->rqs[i], rq, NULL);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drv_tags->lock, flags);
+}
+
void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
- unsigned int hctx_idx)
+ unsigned int hctx_idx, struct request *flush_rq)
{
struct page *page;
@@ -2309,6 +2343,8 @@ void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
}
}
+ blk_mq_clear_rq_mapping(set, tags, hctx_idx, flush_rq);
+
while (!list_empty(&tags->page_list)) {
page = list_first_entry(&tags->page_list, struct page, lru);
list_del_init(&page->lru);
@@ -2368,11 +2404,6 @@ struct blk_mq_tags *blk_mq_alloc_rq_map(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
return tags;
}
-static size_t order_to_size(unsigned int order)
-{
- return (size_t)PAGE_SIZE << order;
-}
-
static int blk_mq_init_request(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct request *rq,
unsigned int hctx_idx, int node)
{
@@ -2461,7 +2492,7 @@ int blk_mq_alloc_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
return 0;
fail:
- blk_mq_free_rqs(set, tags, hctx_idx);
+ blk_mq_free_rqs(set, tags, hctx_idx, NULL);
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -2794,7 +2825,7 @@ static void blk_mq_free_map_and_requests(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
unsigned int flags = set->flags;
if (set->tags && set->tags[hctx_idx]) {
- blk_mq_free_rqs(set, set->tags[hctx_idx], hctx_idx);
+ blk_mq_free_rqs(set, set->tags[hctx_idx], hctx_idx, NULL);
blk_mq_free_rq_map(set->tags[hctx_idx], flags);
set->tags[hctx_idx] = NULL;
}
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
index 143afe42c63a..08ef96c181f6 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq.h
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ void blk_mq_put_rq_ref(struct request *rq);
* Internal helpers for allocating/freeing the request map
*/
void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
- unsigned int hctx_idx);
+ unsigned int hctx_idx, struct request *flush_rq);
void blk_mq_free_rq_map(struct blk_mq_tags *tags, unsigned int flags);
struct blk_mq_tags *blk_mq_alloc_rq_map(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
unsigned int hctx_idx,
--
Ming
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-28 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-27 15:10 [PATCH V3 0/3] blk-mq: fix request UAF related with iterating over tagset requests Ming Lei
2021-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH V3 1/3] block: avoid double io accounting for flush request Ming Lei
2021-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] blk-mq: grab rq->refcount before calling ->fn in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter Ming Lei
2021-04-27 20:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-28 0:07 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-28 1:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-04-28 2:22 ` Ming Lei
2021-04-27 15:10 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] blk-mq: clear stale request in tags->rq[] before freeing one request pool Ming Lei
2021-04-28 14:30 ` David Jeffery
2021-04-28 15:24 ` Ming Lei [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YIl+K0p0jzE/ilo0@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=djeffery@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=khazhy@google.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox