public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: iomap: writeback ioend/bio allocation deadlock risk
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 11:27:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKcouuVR/y/L4T58@T590> (raw)

Hello Guys,

I found there may be two deadlock risk under memory pressure wrt.
ioend/bio allocation in iomap writeback code wrt. bio_alloc_bioset():

        if %__gfp_direct_reclaim is set then bio_alloc will always be able to
        allocate a bio.  this is due to the mempool guarantees.  to make this work,
        callers must never allocate more than 1 bio at a time from the general pool.
        callers that need to allocate more than 1 bio must always submit the
        previously allocated bio for io before attempting to allocate a new one.
        failure to do so can cause deadlocks under memory pressure.

1) more than one ioends can be allocated from 'iomap_ioend_bioset'
before submitting them all, so mempoll guarantee can't be made, which can
be observed frequently in writeback over ext4

2) more than one chained bio(allocated from fs_bio_set) via iomap_chain_bio,
which is easy observed when writing big files on XFS:

- the old bio is submitted _after_ the new allocation
- submission on old chained bio can't make forward progress because all chained
bios can only be freed after the whole ioend is completed, see iomap_finish_ioend()

Both looks not hard to fix, just want to make sure they are real issues?


Thanks,
Ming


             reply	other threads:[~2021-05-21  3:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-21  3:27 Ming Lei [this message]
2021-05-21  7:17 ` iomap: writeback ioend/bio allocation deadlock risk Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-21  7:31   ` Ming Lei
2021-05-21  7:35     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-21  8:35       ` Ming Lei
2021-05-21  8:36         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-21  8:54           ` Ming Lei
2021-05-24 15:32             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-24 23:55             ` Dave Chinner
2021-05-25  4:54               ` Ming Lei
2021-05-25  6:28                 ` Ming Lei
2021-05-25  8:21                   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YKcouuVR/y/L4T58@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox