From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iomap: writeback ioend/bio allocation deadlock risk
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 16:35:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKdwtzp+WWQ3krhI@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210521073547.GA11955@lst.de>
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 09:35:47AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 03:31:05PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > iomap_ioend_bioset is sized to make sure we can always complete up
> > > to 4 pages, and the list is only used inside a page, so we're fine.
> >
> > The number itself does not matter, because there isn't any limit on how
> > many ioends can be allocated before submitting, for example, it can be
> > observed that 64 ioends is allocated before submitting when writing
> > 5GB file to ext4. So far the reserved pool size is 32.
>
> How do you manage to allocate iomap ioends when writing to ext4? ext4
> doesn't use iomap for buffered I/O.
Just double check, the multiple ioends allocation is from root XFS and
not from big file write to ext4, so looks it can be triggered easily in
background writeback.
>
> > > fs_bio_set always has two entries to allow exactly for the common
> > > chain and submit pattern.
> >
> > It is easy to trigger dozens of chained bios in one ioend when writing
> > big file to XFS.
>
> Yes, we can still have one chained bio per ioend, so we need a bioset
> with the same size as iomap_ioend_bioset. That still should not be
> dozends for a common setup, though.
Yeah, that can be one solution.
Just wondering why the ioend isn't submitted out after it becomes full?
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-21 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-21 3:27 iomap: writeback ioend/bio allocation deadlock risk Ming Lei
2021-05-21 7:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-21 7:31 ` Ming Lei
2021-05-21 7:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-21 8:35 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-05-21 8:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-21 8:54 ` Ming Lei
2021-05-24 15:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-24 23:55 ` Dave Chinner
2021-05-25 4:54 ` Ming Lei
2021-05-25 6:28 ` Ming Lei
2021-05-25 8:21 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YKdwtzp+WWQ3krhI@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox