From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] dm: Forbid requeue of writes to zones
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 10:56:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YLo/LO32+rdrfygC@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210525212501.226888-9-damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
On Tue, May 25 2021 at 5:24P -0400,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> wrote:
> A target map method requesting the requeue of a bio with
> DM_MAPIO_REQUEUE or completing it with DM_ENDIO_REQUEUE can cause
> unaligned write errors if the bio is a write operation targeting a
> sequential zone. If a zoned target request such a requeue, warn about
> it and kill the IO.
>
> The function dm_is_zone_write() is introduced to detect write operations
> to zoned targets.
>
> This change does not affect the target drivers supporting zoned devices
> and exposing a zoned device, namely dm-crypt, dm-linear and dm-flakey as
> none of these targets ever request a requeue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> Reviewed-by: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-zone.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> drivers/md/dm.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> drivers/md/dm.h | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-zone.c b/drivers/md/dm-zone.c
> index b42474043249..edc3bbb45637 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-zone.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-zone.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,23 @@ int dm_report_zones(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t start, sector_t sector,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dm_report_zones);
>
> +bool dm_is_zone_write(struct mapped_device *md, struct bio *bio)
> +{
> + struct request_queue *q = md->queue;
> +
> + if (!blk_queue_is_zoned(q))
> + return false;
> +
> + switch (bio_op(bio)) {
> + case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
> + case REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME:
> + case REQ_OP_WRITE:
> + return !op_is_flush(bio->bi_opf) && bio_sectors(bio);
> + default:
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> void dm_set_zones_restrictions(struct dm_table *t, struct request_queue *q)
> {
> if (!blk_queue_is_zoned(q))
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
> index c49976cc4e44..ed8c5a8df2e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
> @@ -846,11 +846,15 @@ static void dec_pending(struct dm_io *io, blk_status_t error)
> * Target requested pushing back the I/O.
> */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&md->deferred_lock, flags);
> - if (__noflush_suspending(md))
> + if (__noflush_suspending(md) &&
> + !WARN_ON_ONCE(dm_is_zone_write(md, bio)))
> /* NOTE early return due to BLK_STS_DM_REQUEUE below */
> bio_list_add_head(&md->deferred, io->orig_bio);
> else
> - /* noflush suspend was interrupted. */
> + /*
> + * noflush suspend was interrupted or this is
> + * a write to a zoned target.
> + */
> io->status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&md->deferred_lock, flags);
> }
So I now see this incremental fix:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dm-devel/patch/20210604004703.408562-1-damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com/
And I've folded it in...
> @@ -947,7 +951,15 @@ static void clone_endio(struct bio *bio)
> int r = endio(tio->ti, bio, &error);
> switch (r) {
> case DM_ENDIO_REQUEUE:
> - error = BLK_STS_DM_REQUEUE;
> + /*
> + * Requeuing writes to a sequential zone of a zoned
> + * target will break the sequential write pattern:
> + * fail such IO.
> + */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dm_is_zone_write(md, bio)))
> + error = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> + else
> + error = BLK_STS_DM_REQUEUE;
> fallthrough;
> case DM_ENDIO_DONE:
> break;
But I'm left wondering why dec_pending, now dm_io_dec_pending, needs
to be modified to also check dm_is_zone_write() if clone_endio() is
already dealing with it?
Not that big a deal, just not loving how we're sprinkling special
zoned code around...
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-04 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-25 21:24 [PATCH v5 00/11] dm: Improve zoned block device support Damien Le Moal
2021-05-25 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] block: improve handling of all zones reset operation Damien Le Moal
2021-05-26 6:36 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-25 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] block: introduce bio zone helpers Damien Le Moal
2021-05-25 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] block: introduce BIO_ZONE_WRITE_LOCKED bio flag Damien Le Moal
2021-05-25 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] dm: Fix dm_accept_partial_bio() Damien Le Moal
2021-05-25 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] dm: cleanup device_area_is_invalid() Damien Le Moal
2021-05-25 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] dm: move zone related code to dm-zone.c Damien Le Moal
2021-05-25 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] dm: Introduce dm_report_zones() Damien Le Moal
2021-05-25 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] dm: Forbid requeue of writes to zones Damien Le Moal
2021-06-04 14:56 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2021-06-05 0:17 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-05-25 21:24 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] dm: rearrange core declarations Damien Le Moal
2021-05-25 21:25 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] dm: introduce zone append emulation Damien Le Moal
2021-05-26 6:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-05-25 21:25 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] dm crypt: Fix zoned block device support Damien Le Moal
2021-06-01 22:57 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] dm: Improve " Damien Le Moal
2021-06-02 18:32 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-06-03 17:46 ` Jens Axboe
2021-06-03 22:16 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-06-03 23:44 ` Damien Le Moal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YLo/LO32+rdrfygC@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox