From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: return ELEVATOR_DISCARD_MERGE if possible
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:18:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQJyYoGbfR7Ym17Q@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67816551.sp8fIUDole@natalenko.name>
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 09:17:28AM +0200, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> On čtvrtek 29. července 2021 5:42:26 CEST Ming Lei wrote:
> > When merging one bio to request, if they are discard IO and the queue
> > supports multi-range discard, we need to return ELEVATOR_DISCARD_MERGE
> > because both block core and related drivers(nvme, virtio-blk) doesn't
> > handle mixed discard io merge(traditional IO merge together with
> > discard merge) well.
> >
> > Fix the issue by returning ELEVATOR_DISCARD_MERGE in this situation,
> > so both blk-mq and drivers just need to handle multi-range discard.
> >
> > Reported-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > block/bfq-iosched.c | 3 +++
> > block/blk-merge.c | 16 ----------------
> > block/elevator.c | 3 +++
> > block/mq-deadline-main.c | 2 ++
> > include/linux/blkdev.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> > index 727955918563..673a634eadd9 100644
> > --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> > +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> > @@ -2361,6 +2361,9 @@ static int bfq_request_merge(struct request_queue *q,
> > struct request **req, __rq = bfq_find_rq_fmerge(bfqd, bio, q);
> > if (__rq && elv_bio_merge_ok(__rq, bio)) {
> > *req = __rq;
> > +
> > + if (blk_discard_mergable(__rq))
> > + return ELEVATOR_DISCARD_MERGE;
> > return ELEVATOR_FRONT_MERGE;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> > index a11b3b53717e..f8707ff7e2fc 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> > @@ -705,22 +705,6 @@ static void blk_account_io_merge_request(struct request
> > *req) }
> > }
> >
> > -/*
> > - * Two cases of handling DISCARD merge:
> > - * If max_discard_segments > 1, the driver takes every bio
> > - * as a range and send them to controller together. The ranges
> > - * needn't to be contiguous.
> > - * Otherwise, the bios/requests will be handled as same as
> > - * others which should be contiguous.
> > - */
> > -static inline bool blk_discard_mergable(struct request *req)
> > -{
> > - if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_DISCARD &&
> > - queue_max_discard_segments(req->q) > 1)
> > - return true;
> > - return false;
> > -}
> > -
> > static enum elv_merge blk_try_req_merge(struct request *req,
> > struct request *next)
> > {
> > diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
> > index 52ada14cfe45..a5fe2615ec0f 100644
> > --- a/block/elevator.c
> > +++ b/block/elevator.c
> > @@ -336,6 +336,9 @@ enum elv_merge elv_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct
> > request **req, __rq = elv_rqhash_find(q, bio->bi_iter.bi_sector);
> > if (__rq && elv_bio_merge_ok(__rq, bio)) {
> > *req = __rq;
> > +
> > + if (blk_discard_mergable(__rq))
> > + return ELEVATOR_DISCARD_MERGE;
> > return ELEVATOR_BACK_MERGE;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/block/mq-deadline-main.c b/block/mq-deadline-main.c
> > index 6f612e6dc82b..294be0c0db65 100644
> > --- a/block/mq-deadline-main.c
> > +++ b/block/mq-deadline-main.c
> > @@ -677,6 +677,8 @@ static int dd_request_merge(struct request_queue *q,
> > struct request **rq,
> >
> > if (elv_bio_merge_ok(__rq, bio)) {
> > *rq = __rq;
> > + if (blk_discard_mergable(__rq))
> > + return ELEVATOR_DISCARD_MERGE;
> > return ELEVATOR_FRONT_MERGE;
> > }
> > }
> > diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > index 3177181c4326..87f00292fd7a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> > @@ -1521,6 +1521,22 @@ static inline int
> > queue_limit_discard_alignment(struct queue_limits *lim, sector return
> > offset << SECTOR_SHIFT;
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Two cases of handling DISCARD merge:
> > + * If max_discard_segments > 1, the driver takes every bio
> > + * as a range and send them to controller together. The ranges
> > + * needn't to be contiguous.
> > + * Otherwise, the bios/requests will be handled as same as
> > + * others which should be contiguous.
> > + */
> > +static inline bool blk_discard_mergable(struct request *req)
> > +{
> > + if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_DISCARD &&
> > + queue_max_discard_segments(req->q) > 1)
> > + return true;
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline int bdev_discard_alignment(struct block_device *bdev)
> > {
> > struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
>
> Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
>
> Also,
>
> Fixes: ?
Fixes: 2705dfb20947 ("block: fix discard request merge")
In theory, the fixes should be 1e739730c5b9 ("block: optionally merge
discontiguous discard bios into a single request"). The reason why it
isn't be triggered before 2705dfb20947 is that the nr_segment of each
bio is exactly 1 for multi-range device.
>
> and possibly:
>
> CC: stable@ # v5.x?
CC: stable@ # v5.13
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-29 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-29 3:42 [PATCH] block: return ELEVATOR_DISCARD_MERGE if possible Ming Lei
2021-07-29 7:17 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2021-07-29 9:18 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-08-05 3:35 ` Ming Lei
2021-08-09 20:30 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
2021-08-09 20:36 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-10 2:47 ` Ming Lei
2021-08-10 2:55 ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-10 3:28 ` Ming Lei
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-21 18:56 Gwendal Grignou
2022-05-23 15:13 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YQJyYoGbfR7Ym17Q@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).