public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>,
	Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/4] blk-mq: fix request UAF related with iterating over tagset requests
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 12:12:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQy2x5RzwveW0ROR@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <678fd2c5-587d-6abe-4348-067210d4adae@huawei.com>

On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 11:40:25AM +0800, yukuai (C) wrote:
> On 2021/05/11 23:22, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Hi Jens,
> > 
> > This patchset fixes the request UAF issue by one simple approach,
> > without clearing ->rqs[] in fast path, please consider it for 5.13.
> > 
> > 1) grab request's ref before calling ->fn in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter,
> > and release it after calling ->fn, so ->fn won't be called for one
> > request if its queue is frozen, done in 2st patch
> > 
> > 2) clearing any stale request referred in ->rqs[] before freeing the
> > request pool, one per-tags spinlock is added for protecting
> > grabbing request ref vs. clearing ->rqs[tag], so UAF by refcount_inc_not_zero
> > in bt_tags_iter() is avoided, done in 3rd patch.
> > 
> > V7:
> > 	- fix one null-ptr-deref during updating nr_hw_queues, because
> > 	blk_mq_clear_flush_rq_mapping() may touch non-mapped hw queue's
> > 	tags, only patch 4/4 is modified, reported and verified by
> > 	Shinichiro Kawasaki
> > 	- run blktests and not see regression
> > 
> > V6:
> > 	- hold spin lock when reading rq via ->rq[tag_bit], the issue is
> > 	  added in V5
> > 	- make blk_mq_find_and_get_req() more clean, as suggested by Bart
> > 	- not hold tags->lock when clearing ->rqs[] for avoiding to disable
> > 	interrupt a bit long, as suggested by Bart
> > 	- code style change, as suggested by Christoph
> > 
> > V5:
> > 	- cover bt_iter() by same approach taken in bt_tags_iter(), and pass
> > 	John's invasive test
> > 	- add tested-by/reviewed-by tag
> > 
> > V4:
> > 	- remove hctx->fq-flush_rq from tags->rqs[] before freeing hw queue,
> > 	patch 4/4 is added, which is based on David's patch.
> > 
> > V3:
> > 	- drop patches for completing requests started in iterator ->fn,
> > 	  because blk-mq guarantees that valid request is passed to ->fn,
> > 	  and it is driver's responsibility for avoiding double completion.
> > 	  And drivers works well for not completing rq twice.
> > 	- add one patch for avoiding double accounting of flush rq
> > 
> > V2:
> > 	- take Bart's suggestion to not add blk-mq helper for completing
> > 	  requests when it is being iterated
> > 	- don't grab rq->ref if the iterator is over static rqs because
> > 	the use case do require to iterate over all requests no matter if
> > 	the request is initialized or not
> > 
> > 
> > Ming Lei (4):
> >    block: avoid double io accounting for flush request
> >    blk-mq: grab rq->refcount before calling ->fn in
> >      blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter
> >    blk-mq: clear stale request in tags->rq[] before freeing one request
> >      pool
> >    blk-mq: clearing flush request reference in tags->rqs[]
> > 
> >   block/blk-flush.c  |  3 +-
> >   block/blk-mq-tag.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++------
> >   block/blk-mq-tag.h |  6 +++
> >   block/blk-mq.c     | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >   block/blk-mq.h     |  1 +
> >   5 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> Hi, ming
> 
> I see this patchset was applied to fix the problem while iterating over
> tagset, however blk_mq_tag_to_rq() is still untouched, and this
> interface might still return freed request.
> 
> Any reason why this interface didn't use the same solution ?
> (hold tags->lock and return null if ref is 0)

It is driver's responsibility to cover race between normal completion
and timeout/error handing, so driver has the knowledge if one tag is valid
or not. In short, it is driver's responsibility to guarantee that valid 'tag'
is passed to blk_mq_tag_to_rq().


Thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-06  4:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-11 15:22 [PATCH V7 0/4] blk-mq: fix request UAF related with iterating over tagset requests Ming Lei
2021-05-11 15:22 ` [PATCH V7 1/4] block: avoid double io accounting for flush request Ming Lei
2021-05-11 15:22 ` [PATCH V7 2/4] blk-mq: grab rq->refcount before calling ->fn in blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter Ming Lei
2021-05-11 15:22 ` [PATCH V7 3/4] blk-mq: clear stale request in tags->rq[] before freeing one request pool Ming Lei
2021-05-11 15:22 ` [PATCH V7 4/4] blk-mq: clearing flush request reference in tags->rqs[] Ming Lei
2021-05-14  0:43 ` [PATCH V7 0/4] blk-mq: fix request UAF related with iterating over tagset requests Ming Lei
2021-05-14 15:34   ` Jens Axboe
2021-08-06  3:40 ` yukuai (C)
2021-08-06  4:12   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-08-06  7:50     ` yukuai (C)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YQy2x5RzwveW0ROR@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=djeffery@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox