Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] blk-crypto: rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile

[Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Sep 29 2021 at 12:35P -0400,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> 
> blk_keyslot_manager is misnamed because it doesn't necessarily manage
> keyslots.  It actually does several different things:
> 
>   - Contains the crypto capabilities of the device.
> 
>   - Provides functions to control the inline encryption hardware.
>     Originally these were just for programming/evicting keyslots;
>     however, new functionality (hardware-wrapped keys) will require new
>     functions here which are unrelated to keyslots.  Moreover,
>     device-mapper devices already (ab)use "keyslot_evict" to pass key
>     eviction requests to their underlying devices even though
>     device-mapper devices don't have any keyslots themselves (so it
>     really should be "evict_key", not "keyslot_evict").
> 
>   - Sometimes (but not always!) it manages keyslots.  Originally it
>     always did, but device-mapper devices don't have keyslots
>     themselves, so they use a "passthrough keyslot manager" which
>     doesn't actually manage keyslots.  This hack works, but the
>     terminology is unnatural.  Also, some hardware doesn't have keyslots
>     and thus also uses a "passthrough keyslot manager" (support for such
>     hardware is yet to be upstreamed, but it will happen eventually).
> 
> Let's stop having keyslot managers which don't actually manage keyslots.
> Instead, rename blk_keyslot_manager to blk_crypto_profile.
> 
> This is a fairly big change, since for consistency it also has to update
> keyslot manager-related function names, variable names, and comments --
> not just the actual struct name.  However it's still a fairly
> straightforward change, as it doesn't change any actual functionality.
> 
> Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> # For MMC
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

Unfortunate how fiddley this change forced you to get but it looks
like you've done a very solid job of cleaning it all up to be
consistent.

Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>