public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: don't dereference request after flush insertion
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:30:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWzcLuH8VWPOf0ZU@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65db3ed2-9cc5-b136-0a54-d477acec9a58@kernel.dk>

On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 08:16:25PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/17/21 8:11 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:02:32AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 07:50:24PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>> On 10/17/21 7:49 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 07:35:39PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>>>> We could have a race here, where the request gets freed before we call
> >>>>> into blk_mq_run_hw_queue(). If this happens, we cannot rely on the state
> >>>>> of the request.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Grab the hardware context before inserting the flush.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> >>>>> index 2197cfbf081f..22b30a89bf3a 100644
> >>>>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> >>>>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> >>>>> @@ -2468,9 +2468,10 @@ void blk_mq_submit_bio(struct bio *bio)
> >>>>>  	}
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>  	if (unlikely(is_flush_fua)) {
> >>>>> +		struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = rq->mq_hctx;
> >>>>>  		/* Bypass scheduler for flush requests */
> >>>>>  		blk_insert_flush(rq);
> >>>>> -		blk_mq_run_hw_queue(rq->mq_hctx, true);
> >>>>> +		blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true);
> >>>>
> >>>> If the request is freed before running queue, the request queue could
> >>>> be released and the hctx may be freed.
> >>>
> >>> No, we still hold a queue enter ref.
> >>
> >> But that one is released when rq is freed since ac7c5675fa45 ("blk-mq: allow
> >> blk_mq_make_request to consume the q_usage_counter reference"), isn't
> >> it?
> > 
> > With commit ac7c5675fa45, any reference to hctx after queuing request could
> > lead to UAF in the code path of blk_mq_submit_bio(). Maybe we need to grab
> > two ref in queue enter, and release one after the bio is submitted.
> 
> I'd rather audit and see if there are any, because extra get+put isn't
> exactly free.

Only direct issue needn't that, looks others do need grab one extra
ref if the request has to be queued somewhere before dispatch.


Thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-18  2:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-17  1:35 [PATCH] block: don't dereference request after flush insertion Jens Axboe
2021-10-18  1:49 ` Ming Lei
2021-10-18  1:50   ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-18  2:02     ` Ming Lei
2021-10-18  2:10       ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-18  8:34         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-10-18  2:11       ` Ming Lei
2021-10-18  2:16         ` Jens Axboe
2021-10-18  2:30           ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-10-18  2:42 ` Ming Lei
2021-10-18  2:44   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YWzcLuH8VWPOf0ZU@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox