linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] block: move queue enter logic into blk_mq_submit_bio()
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 08:44:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YY246bCP+wKw0Z2c@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17ce59ff-bc8c-e8c8-22e1-96605440629a@kernel.dk>

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 03:17:27PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/11/21 8:23 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Hi Geert,
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 03:51:28PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> Hi Ming,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 2:45 PM Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 01:58:38PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, 4 Nov 2021, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>>>> On 11/4/21 1:04 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 01:02:54PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 11/4/21 12:52 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Looks good:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So these two are now:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=for-5.16/block&id=c98cb5bbdab10d187aff9b4e386210eb2332af96
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> which is the one I sent here, and then the next one gets cleaned up to
> >>>>>>> remove that queue enter helper:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/commit/?h=for-5.16/block&id=7f930eb31eeb07f1b606b3316d8ad3ab6a92905b
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Can I add your reviewed-by to this last one as well? Only change is the
> >>>>>>> removal of blk_mq_enter_queue() and the weird construct there, it's just
> >>>>>>> bio_queue_enter() now.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sure.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks, prematurely already done, as you could tell :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> The updated version is now commit 900e080752025f00 ("block: move queue
> >>>> enter logic into blk_mq_submit_bio()") in Linus' tree.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have bisected failures on m68k/atari (on ARAnyM, using nfhd as the
> >>>> root device) to this commit, e.g.:
> >>>>
> >>>>     sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s
> >>>>     sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 Sense Key : Illegal Request [current]
> >>>>     sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 Add. Sense: Invalid field in cdb
> >>>>     sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 CDB: Write(10) 2a 08 00 00 00 01 00 00 08 00
> >>>>     critical target error, dev sda, sector 1 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x20800 phys_seg 1 prio class 0
> >>>>     Buffer I/O error on dev sda1, logical block 0, lost sync page write
> >>>>
> >>>>     EXT4-fs (sda1): I/O error while writing superblock
> >>>>     sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s
> >>>>     sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 Sense Key : Illegal Request [current]
> >>>>     sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 Add. Sense: Invalid field in cdb
> >>>>     sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 CDB: Write(10) 2a 08 00 00 00 01 00 00 08 00
> >>>>     critical target error, dev sda, sector 1 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x20800 phys_seg 1 prio class 0
> >>>>     Buffer I/O error on dev sda1, logical block 0, lost sync page write
> >>>>     EXT4-fs (sda1): I/O error while writing superblock
> >>>>
> >>>> This may happen either when mounting the root file system (leading to an
> >>>> unable to mount root fs panic), or later (leading to a read-only
> >>>> rootfs).
> >>>
> >>> BTW, today I just found that hang in blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() is
> >>> caused by commit 900e080752025f00, and the following patch can fix it:
> >>>
> >>> - blk-mq: don't grab ->q_usage_counter in blk_mq_sched_bio_merge
> >>>
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20211111085650.GA476@lst.de/T/#m759b88fda094a65ebf29bc81b780967cdaf9cf28
> >>>
> >>> Maybe you can try the above patch.
> >>
> >> Thanks! I have applied both patches, but it doesn't make a difference.
> > 
> > Thanks for your test!
> > 
> > Can you try the following patch?
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> > index f511db395c7f..a5ab2f2e9f67 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> > @@ -2517,7 +2517,6 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_get_new_requests(struct request_queue *q,
> >  	struct blk_mq_alloc_data data = {
> >  		.q		= q,
> >  		.nr_tags	= 1,
> > -		.cmd_flags	= bio->bi_opf,
> >  	};
> >  	struct request *rq;
> >  
> > @@ -2525,6 +2524,7 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_get_new_requests(struct request_queue *q,
> >  		return NULL;
> >  	if (unlikely(!submit_bio_checks(bio)))
> >  		goto put_exit;
> > +	data.cmd_flags	= bio->bi_opf;
> >  	if (blk_mq_attempt_bio_merge(q, bio, nsegs, same_queue_rq))
> >  		goto put_exit;
> 
> That's definitely a real fix, akin to the other pre-enter variants, this
> one just post checks. Geert, can you give this a whirl?
> 
> Ming, would you mind sending this as a real patch?

Hi Jens,

The above patch may not be enough, since submit_bio_checks() is done in
case of using cached request, so how about the following patch(un-tested)?


diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index f511db395c7f..f84044c8de3f 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2517,7 +2517,6 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_get_new_requests(struct request_queue *q,
 	struct blk_mq_alloc_data data = {
 		.q		= q,
 		.nr_tags	= 1,
-		.cmd_flags	= bio->bi_opf,
 	};
 	struct request *rq;
 
@@ -2525,6 +2524,7 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_get_new_requests(struct request_queue *q,
 		return NULL;
 	if (unlikely(!submit_bio_checks(bio)))
 		goto put_exit;
+	data.cmd_flags	= bio->bi_opf;
 	if (blk_mq_attempt_bio_merge(q, bio, nsegs, same_queue_rq))
 		goto put_exit;
 
@@ -2564,13 +2564,15 @@ static inline struct request *blk_mq_get_request(struct request_queue *q,
 			if (blk_mq_attempt_bio_merge(q, bio, nsegs,
 						same_queue_rq))
 				return NULL;
+			if (bio->bi_opf != rq->cmd_flags)
+				goto fallback;
 			plug->cached_rq = rq_list_next(rq);
 			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->queuelist);
 			rq_qos_throttle(q, bio);
 			return rq;
 		}
 	}
-
+fallback:
 	return blk_mq_get_new_requests(q, plug, bio, nsegs, same_queue_rq);
 }
 

-- 
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-12  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-04 18:21 [PATCHSET v3 0/5] Alloc batch fixes Jens Axboe
2021-11-04 18:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: have plug stored requests hold references to the queue Jens Axboe
2021-11-04 18:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-04 18:35     ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-04 18:21 ` [PATCH 2/5] block: split request allocation components into helpers Jens Axboe
2021-11-04 18:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-04 18:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] block: make blk_try_enter_queue() available for blk-mq Jens Axboe
2021-11-04 18:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] block: move queue enter logic into blk_mq_submit_bio() Jens Axboe
2021-11-04 18:36   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-04 18:37     ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-04 18:39       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-04 18:40         ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-04 18:45           ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-04 18:52             ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-04 19:02               ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-04 19:04                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-04 19:15                   ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-11 12:58                     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-11-11 13:19                       ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-11-11 14:48                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-11-11 15:36                           ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-11-11 21:35                           ` Michael Schmitz
2021-11-12  7:37                             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-11-12 22:34                               ` Michael Schmitz
2021-11-13  7:02                                 ` Michael Schmitz
2021-11-13 10:06                                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-11-13 22:11                               ` Michael Schmitz
2021-11-11 13:44                       ` Ming Lei
2021-11-11 14:51                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-11-11 15:23                           ` Ming Lei
2021-11-11 22:17                             ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-12  0:44                               ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-11-12  7:51                                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-11-15 19:23                                   ` Michael Schmitz
2021-11-04 18:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] block: ensure cached plug request matches the current queue Jens Axboe
2021-11-04 18:36   ` Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-11-04 15:21 [PATCHSET v2 0/5] Alloc batch fixes Jens Axboe
2021-11-04 15:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] block: move queue enter logic into blk_mq_submit_bio() Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YY246bCP+wKw0Z2c@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).