public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: move io_context creation into where it's needed
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 08:39:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZ0ZUJGilOzhF2k5@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211123161813.326307-2-axboe@kernel.dk>

> +	/* create task io_context, if we don't have one already */
> +	if (unlikely(!current->io_context))
> +		create_task_io_context(current, GFP_ATOMIC, rq->q->node);

Wouldn't it be nicer to have an interface that hides the check
and the somewhat pointless current argument?  And name that with a
blk_ prefix?

> +
> +	blk_mq_sched_assign_ioc(rq);

But thinking about this a little more:

struct io_context has two uses, one is the unsigned short ioprio,
and the other is the whole bfq mess.

Can't we just split the ioprio out (we'll find a hole somewhere
in task_struct) and then just allocate the io_context in
blk_mq_sched_assign_ioc, which would also avoid the pointless
ioc_lookup_icq on a newly allocated io_context.  I'd also really
expect blk_mq_sched_assign_ioc to be implemented in blk-ioc.c.

While we're at it: bfq_bic_lookup is a really weird helper which
gets passed an unused bfqd argument.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-23 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-23 16:18 [PATCHSET 0/3] Misc block cleanups Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: move io_context creation into where it's needed Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:39   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-11-23 16:46     ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:53       ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:56         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-23 17:04           ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] blk-ioprio: don't set bio priority if not needed Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: only allocate poll_stats if there's a user of them Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:21   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-11-23 16:27     ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-23 16:44     ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 17:05       ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-23 17:06         ` Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-11-23 17:10 [PATCHSET 0/3 v2] Misc block cleanups Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 17:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: move io_context creation into where it's needed Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 18:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-23 18:58     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YZ0ZUJGilOzhF2k5@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox