From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: move io_context creation into where it's needed
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 08:39:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZ0ZUJGilOzhF2k5@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211123161813.326307-2-axboe@kernel.dk>
> + /* create task io_context, if we don't have one already */
> + if (unlikely(!current->io_context))
> + create_task_io_context(current, GFP_ATOMIC, rq->q->node);
Wouldn't it be nicer to have an interface that hides the check
and the somewhat pointless current argument? And name that with a
blk_ prefix?
> +
> + blk_mq_sched_assign_ioc(rq);
But thinking about this a little more:
struct io_context has two uses, one is the unsigned short ioprio,
and the other is the whole bfq mess.
Can't we just split the ioprio out (we'll find a hole somewhere
in task_struct) and then just allocate the io_context in
blk_mq_sched_assign_ioc, which would also avoid the pointless
ioc_lookup_icq on a newly allocated io_context. I'd also really
expect blk_mq_sched_assign_ioc to be implemented in blk-ioc.c.
While we're at it: bfq_bic_lookup is a really weird helper which
gets passed an unused bfqd argument.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-23 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-23 16:18 [PATCHSET 0/3] Misc block cleanups Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: move io_context creation into where it's needed Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:39 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-11-23 16:46 ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:53 ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-23 17:04 ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] blk-ioprio: don't set bio priority if not needed Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] block: only allocate poll_stats if there's a user of them Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:21 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2021-11-23 16:27 ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 16:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-23 16:44 ` Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 17:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-23 17:06 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-11-23 17:10 [PATCHSET 0/3 v2] Misc block cleanups Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 17:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: move io_context creation into where it's needed Jens Axboe
2021-11-23 18:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-23 18:58 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YZ0ZUJGilOzhF2k5@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox