From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Cc: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Use REQ_OP_WRITE instead of its integer constant 1 in op_is_write()
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:38:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YZMZrepdF2ppcIba@C02CK6ZVMD6M> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad266071-4b15-2090-d897-3e1b211b6291@opensource.wdc.com>
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 08:48:56AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2021/11/16 6:58, Bean Huo wrote:
> > From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
> >
> > Use the enums REQ_OP_WRITE in op_is_write() to make it less maintenance
> > requirement and more readable
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/blk_types.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/blk_types.h b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> > index fe065c394fff..5b5924a7e754 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/blk_types.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/blk_types.h
> > @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static inline void bio_set_op_attrs(struct bio *bio, unsigned op,
> >
> > static inline bool op_is_write(unsigned int op)
> > {
> > - return (op & 1);
> > + return (op & REQ_OP_WRITE);
> > }
>
> See the comment for "enum req_opf":
>
> /*
> * Operations and flags common to the bio and request structures.
> * We use 8 bits for encoding the operation, and the remaining 24 for flags.
> *
> * The least significant bit of the operation number indicates the data
> * transfer direction:
> *
> * - if the least significant bit is set transfers are TO the device
> * - if the least significant bit is not set transfers are FROM the device
> *
> * If a operation does not transfer data the least significant bit has no
> * meaning.
> */
>
> So using "1" is correct. Using REQ_OP_WRITE is confusing as it seem to imply
> that op_is_write() tests for "op is REQ_OP_WRITE" instead of the intended "op is
> transferring data TO the device". If anything, op_is_write() could be renamed to
> clarify that.
Yeah, REQ_OP_WRITE is a value, not a flag. The op_is_write() tests the data
direction flag, which coincidentally happens to be the same as the current,
somewhat arbitrarily chosen value of REQ_OP_WRITE. The op could just as easily
have been set to 0xff.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-16 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-15 21:58 [PATCH] block: Use REQ_OP_WRITE instead of its integer constant 1 in op_is_write() Bean Huo
2021-11-15 23:48 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-11-16 2:38 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2021-11-16 1:30 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YZMZrepdF2ppcIba@C02CK6ZVMD6M \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox