public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V2 0/1] blk-lib: cleanup bdev_get_queue()
@ 2022-02-15 11:52 Chaitanya Kulkarni
  2022-02-15 11:52 ` [PATCH V2 1/1] blk-lib: don't check bdev_get_queue() NULL check Chaitanya Kulkarni
  2022-02-15 14:51 ` [PATCH V2 0/1] blk-lib: cleanup bdev_get_queue() Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni @ 2022-02-15 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-block
  Cc: axboe, ming.lei, damien.lemoal, jiangguoqing, shinichiro.kawasaki,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni

Hi,

Based on the comment in the include/linux/blkdev.h:bdev_get_queue()
the return value of the function will never be NULL. This patch series
removes those checks present in the blk-lib.c, also removes the not
needed local variable pointer to request_queue from the write_zeroes
helpers.

Below is the test log for  discard (__blkdev_issue_disacrd()) and
write-zeroes (__blkdev_issue_write_zeroes/__blkdev_issue_zero_pages()).

-ck

changes from V1:-

1. squash all patches into single patch. (Jens)

Chaitanya Kulkarni (1):
  blk-lib: don't check bdev_get_queue() NULL check

 block/blk-lib.c | 14 --------------
 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)

1. Execute discard (__blkdev_issue_disacrd()) and write-zeroes
   (__blkdev_issue_write_zeroes, __blkdev_issue_zero_pages())

+ git diff block drivers/block/null_blk
diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
index fc6ea52e7482..84e5f31436d7 100644
--- a/block/blk-lib.c
+++ b/block/blk-lib.c
@@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,

                WARN_ON_ONCE((req_sects << 9) > UINT_MAX);

+               pr_info("%s %d sector %llu nr_sects %llu\n",
+                               __func__, __LINE__, sector, nr_sects);
                bio = blk_next_bio(bio, bdev, 0, op, gfp_mask);
                bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
                bio->bi_iter.bi_size = req_sects << 9;
@@ -237,6 +239,8 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_write_zeroes(struct block_device *bdev,
                return -EOPNOTSUPP;

        while (nr_sects) {
+               pr_info("%s %d sector %llu nr_sects %llu\n",
+                               __func__, __LINE__, sector, nr_sects);
                bio = blk_next_bio(bio, bdev, 0, REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES, gfp_mask);
                bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
                if (flags & BLKDEV_ZERO_NOUNMAP)
@@ -282,6 +286,8 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_zero_pages(struct block_device *bdev,
                return -EPERM;

        while (nr_sects != 0) {
+               pr_info("%s %d sector %llu nr_sects %llu\n",
+                               __func__, __LINE__, sector, nr_sects);
                bio = blk_next_bio(bio, bdev, __blkdev_sectors_to_bio_pages(nr_sects),
                                   REQ_OP_WRITE, gfp_mask);
                bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
diff --git a/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c b/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
index 13004beb48ca..584ac0519c3e 100644
--- a/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
+++ b/drivers/block/null_blk/main.c
@@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ static bool g_virt_boundary = false;
 module_param_named(virt_boundary, g_virt_boundary, bool, 0444);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(virt_boundary, "Require a virtual boundary for the device. Default: False");

+static bool g_write_zeroes = false;
+module_param_named(write_zeroes, g_write_zeroes, bool, 0444);
+
 static int g_no_sched;
 module_param_named(no_sched, g_no_sched, int, 0444);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_sched, "No io scheduler");
@@ -1755,25 +1758,12 @@ static void null_del_dev(struct nullb *nullb)

 static void null_config_discard(struct nullb *nullb)
 {
-       if (nullb->dev->discard == false)
-               return;
-
-       if (!nullb->dev->memory_backed) {
-               nullb->dev->discard = false;
-               pr_info("discard option is ignored without memory backing\n");
-               return;
-       }
-
-       if (nullb->dev->zoned) {
-               nullb->dev->discard = false;
-               pr_info("discard option is ignored in zoned mode\n");
-               return;
-       }
-
        nullb->q->limits.discard_granularity = nullb->dev->blocksize;
        nullb->q->limits.discard_alignment = nullb->dev->blocksize;
        blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(nullb->q, UINT_MAX >> 9);
        blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, nullb->q);
+       if (g_write_zeroes)
+               blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(nullb->q, UINT_MAX >> 9);
 }

 static const struct block_device_operations null_bio_ops = {
+ modprobe -r null_blk
+ modprobe null_blk
+ blkdiscard -o 0 -l 40960 /dev/nullb0
+ dmesg -c
[  261.219011] null_blk: module loaded
*[  261.232872] __blkdev_issue_discard 82 sector 0 nr_sects 80*
+ blkdiscard -z -o 0 -l 40960 /dev/nullb0
+ dmesg -c
*[  261.245818] __blkdev_issue_zero_pages 289 sector 0 nr_sects 80*
+ modprobe -r null_blk
+ modprobe null_blk write_zeroes=1
+ blkdiscard -z -o 0 -l 40960 /dev/nullb0
+ dmesg -c
[  261.328251] null_blk: module loaded
*[  261.337313] __blkdev_issue_write_zeroes 242 sector 0 nr_sects 80*
+ modprobe -r null_blk
+ set +x

-- 
2.29.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2 1/1] blk-lib: don't check bdev_get_queue() NULL check
  2022-02-15 11:52 [PATCH V2 0/1] blk-lib: cleanup bdev_get_queue() Chaitanya Kulkarni
@ 2022-02-15 11:52 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
  2022-02-15 12:02   ` Ming Lei
  2022-02-15 14:51 ` [PATCH V2 0/1] blk-lib: cleanup bdev_get_queue() Jens Axboe
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni @ 2022-02-15 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-block
  Cc: axboe, ming.lei, damien.lemoal, jiangguoqing, shinichiro.kawasaki,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni

Based on the comment present in the bdev_get_queue()
bdev->bd_queue can never be NULL. Remove the NULL check for the local
variable q that is set from bdev_get_queue() for discard, write_same,
and write_zeroes.

Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
---
 block/blk-lib.c | 14 --------------
 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
index 1b8ced45e4e5..fc6ea52e7482 100644
--- a/block/blk-lib.c
+++ b/block/blk-lib.c
@@ -19,9 +19,6 @@ int __blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 	unsigned int op;
 	sector_t bs_mask, part_offset = 0;
 
-	if (!q)
-		return -ENXIO;
-
 	if (bdev_read_only(bdev))
 		return -EPERM;
 
@@ -156,9 +153,6 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_write_same(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 	struct bio *bio = *biop;
 	sector_t bs_mask;
 
-	if (!q)
-		return -ENXIO;
-
 	if (bdev_read_only(bdev))
 		return -EPERM;
 
@@ -232,10 +226,6 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_write_zeroes(struct block_device *bdev,
 {
 	struct bio *bio = *biop;
 	unsigned int max_write_zeroes_sectors;
-	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
-
-	if (!q)
-		return -ENXIO;
 
 	if (bdev_read_only(bdev))
 		return -EPERM;
@@ -284,14 +274,10 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_zero_pages(struct block_device *bdev,
 		sector_t sector, sector_t nr_sects, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 		struct bio **biop)
 {
-	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
 	struct bio *bio = *biop;
 	int bi_size = 0;
 	unsigned int sz;
 
-	if (!q)
-		return -ENXIO;
-
 	if (bdev_read_only(bdev))
 		return -EPERM;
 
-- 
2.29.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 1/1] blk-lib: don't check bdev_get_queue() NULL check
  2022-02-15 11:52 ` [PATCH V2 1/1] blk-lib: don't check bdev_get_queue() NULL check Chaitanya Kulkarni
@ 2022-02-15 12:02   ` Ming Lei
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2022-02-15 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chaitanya Kulkarni
  Cc: linux-block, axboe, damien.lemoal, jiangguoqing,
	shinichiro.kawasaki

On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 03:52:47AM -0800, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> Based on the comment present in the bdev_get_queue()
> bdev->bd_queue can never be NULL. Remove the NULL check for the local
> variable q that is set from bdev_get_queue() for discard, write_same,
> and write_zeroes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>

Looks fine,

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>

-- 
Ming


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2 0/1] blk-lib: cleanup bdev_get_queue()
  2022-02-15 11:52 [PATCH V2 0/1] blk-lib: cleanup bdev_get_queue() Chaitanya Kulkarni
  2022-02-15 11:52 ` [PATCH V2 1/1] blk-lib: don't check bdev_get_queue() NULL check Chaitanya Kulkarni
@ 2022-02-15 14:51 ` Jens Axboe
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2022-02-15 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-block, Chaitanya Kulkarni
  Cc: jiangguoqing, damien.lemoal, ming.lei, shinichiro.kawasaki

On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 03:52:46 -0800, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> Based on the comment in the include/linux/blkdev.h:bdev_get_queue()
> the return value of the function will never be NULL. This patch series
> removes those checks present in the blk-lib.c, also removes the not
> needed local variable pointer to request_queue from the write_zeroes
> helpers.
> 
> Below is the test log for  discard (__blkdev_issue_disacrd()) and
> write-zeroes (__blkdev_issue_write_zeroes/__blkdev_issue_zero_pages()).
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[0/1] blk-lib: cleanup bdev_get_queue()
      (no commit info)
[1/1] blk-lib: don't check bdev_get_queue() NULL check
      (no commit info)

Best regards,
-- 
Jens Axboe



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-15 14:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-15 11:52 [PATCH V2 0/1] blk-lib: cleanup bdev_get_queue() Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-02-15 11:52 ` [PATCH V2 1/1] blk-lib: don't check bdev_get_queue() NULL check Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-02-15 12:02   ` Ming Lei
2022-02-15 14:51 ` [PATCH V2 0/1] blk-lib: cleanup bdev_get_queue() Jens Axboe

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox