RE: [LSF/MM/BPF BoF] BoF for Zoned Storage

Matias Bjørling
2022-03-03T04:32:05Z

Good idea to bring up zoned storage topics. I'd like to participate as well.

Best, Matias

-----Original Message-----
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Sent: Thursday, 3 March 2022 02.33
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>; linux-block@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Matias Bjørling <Matias.Bjorling@wdc.com>; Javier González <javier.gonz@samsung.com>; Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>; Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@samsung.com>; Keith Busch <Keith.Busch@wdc.com>; Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>; Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@wdc.com>; Pankaj Raghav <pankydev8@gmail.com>; Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>; Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF BoF] BoF for Zoned Storage

On 3/2/22 16:56, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> Thinking proactively about LSFMM, regarding just Zone storage..
>
> I'd like to propose a BoF for Zoned Storage. The point of it is to
> address the existing point points we have and take advantage of having
> folks in the room we can likely settle on things faster which
> otherwise would take years.
>
> I'll throw at least one topic out:
>
> * Raw access for zone append for microbenchmarks:
> - are we really happy with the status quo?
> - if not what outlets do we have?
>
> I think the nvme passthrogh stuff deserves it's own shared discussion
> though and should not make it part of the BoF.

Since I'm working on zoned storage I'd like to participate.

Thanks,

Bart.