From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: add WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag to per device workqueue
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 06:52:14 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yjn+vpHZzvxiAUaK@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ce1e26c-9050-9a4d-03b1-fb6ad57a5ccf@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 09:09:53AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > The legacy flushing warning is telling us that those workqueues can be
>
> s/can be/must be/ ?
Well, one thing that we can but don't want to do is converting all
create_workqueue() users to alloc_workqueue() with MEM_RECLAIM, which is
wasteful but won't break anything. We know for sure that the workqueues
which trigger the legacy warning are participating in memory reclaim and
thus need MEM_RECLAIM. So, yeah, the warning tells us that they need
MEM_RECLAIM and should be converted.
> ? Current /* internal: create*_workqueue() */ tells me nothing.
It's trying to say that it shouldn't be used outside workqueue proper and
the warning message is supposed to trigger the conversion. But, yeah, a
stronger comment can help.
> My question is: I want to add WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag to the WQ used by loop module
> because this WQ is involved upon writeback operation. But unless I add both
> __WQ_LEGACY | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flags to the WQ used by loop module, we will hit
>
> WARN_ONCE(worker && ((worker->current_pwq->wq->flags &
> (WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | __WQ_LEGACY)) == WQ_MEM_RECLAIM),
>
> warning because e.g. xfs-sync WQ used by xfs module is not using WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag.
>
> mp->m_sync_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("xfs-sync/%s",
> XFS_WQFLAGS(WQ_FREEZABLE), 0, mp->m_super->s_id);
>
> You are suggesting that the correct approach is to add WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag to WQs
> used by filesystems when adding WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag to the WQ used by loop module
> introduces possibility of hitting
>
> WARN_ONCE(worker && ((worker->current_pwq->wq->flags &
> (WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | __WQ_LEGACY)) == WQ_MEM_RECLAIM),
>
> warning (instead of either adding __WQ_LEGACY | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flags to the WQ used
> by loop module or giving up WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag for the WQ used by loop module),
> correct?
Yeah, you detected multiple issues at the same time. xfs sync is
participating in memory reclaim but doesn't have MEM_RECLAIM and loop is
marked with LEGACY but flushing other workqueues which are MEM_RECLIAM. So,
both xfs and loop workqueues need to be explicitly marked with MEM_RECLAIM.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-22 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-17 14:08 [PATCH] loop: add WQ_MEM_RECLAIM flag to per device workqueue Tetsuo Handa
2022-03-17 14:38 ` Dan Schatzberg
2022-03-18 12:05 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-03-18 17:15 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-19 2:02 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-03-21 16:55 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-21 22:53 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-03-21 23:04 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-21 23:17 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-03-21 23:27 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-22 0:09 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-03-22 16:52 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2022-03-22 22:00 ` Dave Chinner
2022-03-22 22:02 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-22 22:05 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-03-22 22:19 ` Tejun Heo
2022-03-22 22:59 ` Dave Chinner
2022-03-22 23:32 ` Tetsuo Handa
2022-03-22 23:50 ` Dave Chinner
2022-03-23 0:09 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yjn+vpHZzvxiAUaK@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=schatzberg.dan@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox