From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE22C433EF for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2022 05:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229701AbiDIFRw (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2022 01:17:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37956 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232130AbiDIFRv (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2022 01:17:51 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 691C826129 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 22:15:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=v5AUaXmXbfF5lrBdpvkZcFbAxCun5fHL446CBq+qPn4=; b=3yzv0B+b5AiWTVUvxQOp6I5XfM 7te3Z0QZ9NjotZL9XDb9lV/pQObdOzPM/gU5a4EkihalsNWIwO091pEBsRO1LmbQEkhYatEmv8qcc uDIPhnp0Hc98F0lXlT4j4MUtqqqMEOrXNIalVA9lydLwXsUL3KmmXg/9DvJlth1Q2D7NYqUHPI1FU F66XDI/AFfUFtiofXf0861VcJt379gJMkuGLOCyhDnurMzR+86P1b6z0qj6gVZIk4xq6gHkoHKQNU iRHQCxoQ+HzDEDcAkFRj88nHpLzBjjp/wBMfuv0Pid7m5W0CdXDmJpecq56i7RqOPwaz/A7ZB9gEq /rFHiIpA==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nd3Rl-002DAU-Bg; Sat, 09 Apr 2022 05:15:41 +0000 Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 22:15:41 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Mike Snitzer Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Dennis Zhou , Mike Snitzer , tj@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: can we reduce bio_set_dev overhead due to bio_associate_blkg? Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 11:42:51AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > I think we can achieve the goal of efficient cloning/remapping for > both usecases simply by splitting out the bio_set_dev() and leaving it > to the caller to pick which interface to use (e.g. clone vs > clone_and_remap). You can just pass a NULL bdev to bio_alloc_clone/bio_init_clone. I've been hoping to get rid of that, but if we have a clear use case it will have to stay.