From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@invisiblethingslab.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Block Mailing List <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Filesystem Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Race-free block device opening
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 20:35:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ymg7dihxLG923vs3@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ymg2HIc8NGraPNbM@itl-email>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 02:12:22PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> Right now, opening block devices in a race-free way is incredibly hard.
> The only reasonable approach I know of is sd_device_new_from_path() +
> sd_device_open(), and is only available in systemd git main. It also
> requires waiting on systemd-udev to have processed udev rules, which can
> be a bottleneck. There are better approaches in various special cases,
> such as using device-mapper ioctls to check that the device one has
> opened still has the name and/or UUID one expects. However, none of
> them works for a plain call to open(2).
Why do you call open(2) on a block device?
> A much better approach would be for udev to point its symlinks at
> "/dev/disk/by-diskseq/$DISKSEQ" for non-partition disk devices, or at
> "/dev/disk/by-diskseq/${DISKSEQ}p${PARTITION}" for partitions.
You can do that today with udev rules, right?
> A
> filesystem would then be mounted at "/dev/disk/by-diskseq" that provides
> for race-free opening of these paths.
How would it be any less race-free than just open("/dev/sda1") is?
> This could be implemented in
> userspace using FUSE, either with difficulty using the current kernel
> API, or easily and efficiently using a new kernel API for opening a
> block device by diskseq + partition. However, I think this should be
> handled by the Linux kernel itself.
>
> What would be necessary to get this into the kernel?
Get what exactly? I don't see anything the kernel needs to do here
specifically. Normally block devices are accessed using mount(2), not
open(2). Do you want a new mount(2)-type api?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-26 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-26 18:12 Race-free block device opening Demi Marie Obenour
2022-04-26 18:35 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-04-26 21:31 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2022-04-26 22:07 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2022-04-27 13:29 ` James Bottomley
2022-05-07 11:35 ` Demi Marie Obenour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ymg7dihxLG923vs3@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=demi@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox