public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+3e3f419f4a7816471838@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: disable the elevator int del_gendisk
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 08:54:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ypa4xrAHUslpQPhN@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220531160535.3444915-1-hch@lst.de>

On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 06:05:35PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The elevator is only used for file system requests, which are stopped in
> del_gendisk.  Move disabling the elevator and freeing the scheduler tags
> to the end of del_gendisk instead of doing that work in disk_release and
> blk_cleanup_queue to avoid a use after free on q->tag_set from
> disk_release as the tag_set might not be alive at that point.
> 
> Move the blk_qos_exit call as well, as it just depends on the elevator
> exit and would be the only reason to keep the not exactly cheap queue
> freeze in disk_release.
> 
> Fixes: e155b0c238b2 ("blk-mq: Use shared tags for shared sbitmap support")
> Reported-by: syzbot+3e3f419f4a7816471838@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Tested-by: syzbot+3e3f419f4a7816471838@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c | 13 -------------
>  block/genhd.c    | 38 ++++++++++----------------------------
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 80fa73c419a99..19cfa71e33728 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -322,19 +322,6 @@ void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>  		blk_mq_exit_queue(q);
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * In theory, request pool of sched_tags belongs to request queue.
> -	 * However, the current implementation requires tag_set for freeing
> -	 * requests, so free the pool now.
> -	 *
> -	 * Queue has become frozen, there can't be any in-queue requests, so
> -	 * it is safe to free requests now.
> -	 */
> -	mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> -	if (q->elevator)
> -		blk_mq_sched_free_rqs(q);
> -	mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> -
>  	/* @q is and will stay empty, shutdown and put */
>  	blk_put_queue(q);
>  }
> diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
> index 8ff5b187791af..9914d0f24fecd 100644
> --- a/block/genhd.c
> +++ b/block/genhd.c
> @@ -649,6 +649,16 @@ void del_gendisk(struct gendisk *disk)
>  
>  	blk_sync_queue(q);
>  	blk_flush_integrity();
> +	blk_mq_cancel_work_sync(q);
> +
> +	if (q->elevator) {
> +		mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> +		elevator_exit(q);
> +		mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> +	}

This way can't be safe, who can guarantee that all sync submission
activities are gone after queue is frozen? We had lots of reports on
blk_mq_sched_has_work() which triggers UAF.

Thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-01  0:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-31 16:05 [PATCH] block: disable the elevator int del_gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-01  0:54 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-06-01  6:43   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-01  7:09     ` Ming Lei
2022-06-01  7:14       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-01  9:07         ` Ming Lei
2022-06-01 12:01           ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ypa4xrAHUslpQPhN@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+3e3f419f4a7816471838@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox