From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, yukuai3@huawei.com,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+3e3f419f4a7816471838@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
ming.lei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: disable the elevator int del_gendisk
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 16:23:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YqhFiDx0/IW25bSp@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220614074827.458955-2-hch@lst.de>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 09:48:24AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The elevator is only used for file system requests, which are stopped in
> del_gendisk. Move disabling the elevator and freeing the scheduler tags
> to the end of del_gendisk instead of doing that work in disk_release and
> blk_cleanup_queue to avoid a use after free on q->tag_set from
> disk_release as the tag_set might not be alive at that point.
>
> Move the blk_qos_exit call as well, as it just depends on the elevator
> exit and would be the only reason to keep the not exactly cheap queue
> freeze in disk_release.
>
> Fixes: e155b0c238b2 ("blk-mq: Use shared tags for shared sbitmap support")
> Reported-by: syzbot+3e3f419f4a7816471838@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Tested-by: syzbot+3e3f419f4a7816471838@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> ---
> block/blk-core.c | 13 -------------
> block/genhd.c | 39 +++++++++++----------------------------
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 06ff5bbfe8f66..27fb1357ad4b8 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -322,19 +322,6 @@ void blk_cleanup_queue(struct request_queue *q)
> blk_mq_exit_queue(q);
> }
>
> - /*
> - * In theory, request pool of sched_tags belongs to request queue.
> - * However, the current implementation requires tag_set for freeing
> - * requests, so free the pool now.
> - *
> - * Queue has become frozen, there can't be any in-queue requests, so
> - * it is safe to free requests now.
> - */
> - mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> - if (q->elevator)
> - blk_mq_sched_free_rqs(q);
> - mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> -
> /* @q is and will stay empty, shutdown and put */
> blk_put_queue(q);
> }
> diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
> index 27205ae47d593..e0675772178b0 100644
> --- a/block/genhd.c
> +++ b/block/genhd.c
> @@ -652,6 +652,17 @@ void del_gendisk(struct gendisk *disk)
>
> blk_sync_queue(q);
> blk_flush_integrity();
> + blk_mq_cancel_work_sync(q);
> +
> + blk_mq_quiesce_queue(q);
quiesce queue adds a bit long delay in del_gendisk, not sure if this way may
cause regression in big machines with lots of disks.
> + if (q->elevator) {
> + mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> + elevator_exit(q);
> + mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> + }
> + rq_qos_exit(q);
> + blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(q);
Also tearing down elevator here has to be carefully, that means any
elevator reference has to hold rcu read lock or .q_usage_counter,
meantime it has to be checked, otherwise use-after-free may be caused.
Unfortunately, there are some cases which looks not safe, such as,
__blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues() and blk_mq_has_sqsched().
Another example is bfq_insert_request()<-bfq_insert_requests():
static void bfq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
bool at_head)
{
...
spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
bfq_update_insert_stats(q, bfqq, idle_timer_disabled,
cmd_flags);
}
If last 'rq' is done between unlocking bfqd->lock and calling bfq_update_insert_stats,
del_gendisk() may tear down elevator, and UAF is caused.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-14 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-14 7:48 fix tag freeing use after free and debugfs name reuse Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-14 7:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: disable the elevator int del_gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-14 8:23 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-06-14 8:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-14 11:27 ` Ming Lei
2022-06-17 12:50 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-17 13:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-17 13:27 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-14 7:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: serialize all debugfs operations using q->debugfs_mutex Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-14 7:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] block: remove per-disk debugfs files in blk_unregister_queue Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-14 7:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] block: freeze the queue earlier in del_gendisk Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-08 5:41 ` REGRESSION: " Logan Gunthorpe
2022-07-08 6:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-08 15:55 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-07-09 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-11 3:33 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2022-07-11 4:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-06-17 13:31 ` fix tag freeing use after free and debugfs name reuse Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YqhFiDx0/IW25bSp@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=syzbot+3e3f419f4a7816471838@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox