From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: do not lookup algorithm in backends table
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:20:05 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YrMzJSNb4b+tODqR@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220622023501.517125-1-senozhatsky@chromium.org>
On (22/06/22 11:35), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Always use crypto_has_comp() so that crypto can lookup module,
> call usermodhelper to load the modules, wait for usermodhelper
> to finish and so on. Otherwise crypto will do all of these steps
> under CPU hot-plug lock and this looks like too much stuff to
> handle under the CPU hot-plug lock. Besides this can end up in
> a deadlock when usermodhelper triggers a code path that attempts
> to lock the CPU hot-plug lock, that zram already holds.
And we think that we (not exactly "we", our partners) actually
see a deadlock. It goes something like this:
- path A. zram grabs CPU hot-plug lock, execs /sbin/modprobe from crypto
and waits for modprobe to finish
disksize_store
zcomp_create
__cpuhp_state_add_instance
__cpuhp_state_add_instance_cpuslocked
zcomp_cpu_up_prepare
crypto_alloc_base
crypto_alg_mod_lookup
call_usermodehelper_exec
wait_for_completion_killable
do_wait_for_common
schedule
- path B. async work kthread that brings in scsi device. It wants to
register CPUHP states at some point, and it needs the CPU hot-plug
lock for that, which is owned by zram.
async_run_entry_fn
scsi_probe_and_add_lun
scsi_mq_alloc_queue
blk_mq_init_queue
blk_mq_init_allocated_queue
blk_mq_realloc_hw_ctxs
__cpuhp_state_add_instance
__cpuhp_state_add_instance_cpuslocked
mutex_lock
schedule
- path C. modprobe sleeps, waiting for all aync works to finish.
load_module
do_init_module
async_synchronize_full
async_synchronize_cookie_domain
schedule
And none can make any progress.
So I think we need to move crypto_alg_mod_lookup()->call_usermodehelper_exec()
out of CPU hot-plug lock and pre-load modules in advance, before we grab the
hot-plug lock.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-22 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-22 2:35 [PATCH] zram: do not lookup algorithm in backends table Sergey Senozhatsky
2022-06-22 15:20 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2022-06-22 19:19 ` Andrew Morton
2022-06-23 0:21 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YrMzJSNb4b+tODqR@google.com \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox