From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "yangx.jy@fujitsu.com" <yangx.jy@fujitsu.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [bug report from blktests nvme/032] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 23:09:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YrqbNfF9uYMSwZ4V@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YrqauCHdcieF5+C7@kroah.com>
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 08:07:52AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 04:03:55AM +0000, yangx.jy@fujitsu.com wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Running blktests nvme/032 on kernel v5.19-rc2+ which enables
> > CONFIG_LOCKDEP and CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING triggered the below WARNING.
>
> What was happening when this trace was created? It looks like you were
> manually removing a PCI device from the system through sysfs? Why would
> blktests do that?
To test how the block layer copes with the fact that the underlying
device goes away.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-28 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-28 4:03 [bug report from blktests nvme/032] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected yangx.jy
2022-06-28 6:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-28 6:09 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-06-28 6:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-06-28 6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-05 0:48 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2022-07-19 2:05 ` yangx.jy
2022-07-19 4:42 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YrqbNfF9uYMSwZ4V@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yangx.jy@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox