From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Cc: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>, Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
"zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: run queue after issuing the last request of the plug list
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:32:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yt9SMuSlCtwwzyEz@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ba2b30f2-66d9-3acb-787d-fae1894fa5a6@huawei.com>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:08:13AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> 在 2022/07/26 9:46, Ming Lei 写道:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 09:08:19AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> > > Hi, Ming!
> > >
> > > 在 2022/07/25 23:43, Ming Lei 写道:
> > > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 10:50:03AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> > > > > Hi, Ming!
> > > > >
> > > > > 在 2022/07/19 17:26, Ming Lei 写道:
> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 08:35:28PM +0800, Yufen Yu wrote:
> > > > > > > We do test on a virtio scsi device (/dev/sda) and the default mq
> > > > > > > scheduler is 'none'. We found a IO hung as following:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > blk_finish_plug
> > > > > > > blk_mq_plug_issue_direct
> > > > > > > scsi_mq_get_budget
> > > > > > > //get budget_token fail and sdev->restarts=1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > scsi_end_request
> > > > > > > scsi_run_queue_async
> > > > > > > //sdev->restart=0 and run queue
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > blk_mq_request_bypass_insert
> > > > > > > //add request to hctx->dispatch list
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here the issue shouldn't be related with scsi's get budget or
> > > > > > scsi_run_queue_async.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If blk-mq adds request into ->dispatch_list, it is blk-mq core's
> > > > > > responsibility to re-run queue for moving on. Can you investigate a
> > > > > > bit more why blk-mq doesn't run queue after adding request to
> > > > > > hctx dispatch list?
> > > > >
> > > > > I think Yufen is probably thinking about the following Concurrent
> > > > > scenario:
> > > > >
> > > > > blk_mq_flush_plug_list
> > > > > # assume there are three rq
> > > > > blk_mq_plug_issue_direct
> > > > > blk_mq_request_issue_directly
> > > > > # dispatch rq1, succeed
> > > > > blk_mq_request_issue_directly
> > > > > # dispatch rq2
> > > > > __blk_mq_try_issue_directly
> > > > > blk_mq_get_dispatch_budget
> > > > > scsi_mq_get_budget
> > > > > atomic_inc(&sdev->restarts);
> > > > > # rq2 failed to get budget
> > > > > # restarts is 1 now
> > > > > scsi_end_request
> > > > > # rq1 is completed
> > > > > ┊scsi_run_queue_async
> > > > > ┊ atomic_cmpxchg(&sdev->restarts,
> > > > > old, 0) == old
> > > > > ┊ # set restarts to 0
> > > > > ┊ blk_mq_run_hw_queues
> > > > > ┊ # hctx->dispatch list is empty
> > > > > blk_mq_request_bypass_insert
> > > > > # insert rq2 to hctx->dispatch list
> > > >
> > > > After rq2 is added to ->dispatch_list in blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly(),
> > > > no matter if list_empty(list) is empty or not, queue will be run either from
> > > > blk_mq_request_bypass_insert() or blk_mq_sched_insert_requests().
> > >
> > > 1) while inserting rq2 to dispatch list, blk_mq_request_bypass_insert()
> > > is called from blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly(), list_empty() won't
> > > pass, thus thus blk_mq_request_bypass_insert() won't run queue.
> >
> > Yeah, but in blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly() after rq2 is inserted to dispatch
> > list, the loop is broken and blk_mq_try_issue_list_directly() returns to
> > blk_mq_sched_insert_requests() in which list_empty() is false, so
> > blk_mq_insert_requests() and blk_mq_run_hw_queue() are called, queue
> > is still run.
> >
> > Also not sure why you make rq3 involved, since the list is local list on
> > stack, and it can be operated concurrently.
>
> I make rq3 involved because there are some conditions that
> blk_mq_insert_requests() and blk_mq_run_hw_queue() won't be called from
> blk_mq_sched_insert_requests():
The two won't be called if list_empty() is true, and will be called if
!list_empty().
That is why I mentioned run queue has been done after rq2 is added to
->dispatch_list.
Can you show the debugfs log after the hang is caused?
thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-26 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-18 12:35 [PATCH] blk-mq: run queue after issuing the last request of the plug list Yufen Yu
2022-07-19 9:26 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-19 11:00 ` Yufen Yu
2022-07-23 2:50 ` Yu Kuai
2022-07-25 15:43 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-26 1:08 ` Yu Kuai
2022-07-26 1:46 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-26 2:08 ` Yu Kuai
2022-07-26 2:32 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-07-26 2:52 ` Yu Kuai
2022-07-26 3:02 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-26 3:14 ` Yu Kuai
2022-07-26 3:21 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-26 3:31 ` Yufen Yu
2022-07-26 3:31 ` Yu Kuai
2022-07-26 4:16 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-26 5:01 ` Yufen Yu
2022-07-26 7:39 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-26 9:20 ` Yufen Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yt9SMuSlCtwwzyEz@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
--cc=yuyufen@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox