From: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] ublk: simplify aborting ublk request
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:42:19 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z/1zK7ycY+iLZBmL@dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250414112554.3025113-9-ming.lei@redhat.com>
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 07:25:49PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Now ublk_abort_queue() is moved to ublk char device release handler,
> meantime our request queue is "quiesced" because either ->canceling was
> set from uring_cmd cancel function or all IOs are inflight and can't be
> completed by ublk server, things becomes easy much:
>
> - all uring_cmd are done, so we needn't to mark io as UBLK_IO_FLAG_ABORTED
> for handling completion from uring_cmd
>
> - ublk char device is closed, no one can hold IO request reference any more,
> so we can simply complete this request or requeue it for ublk_nosrv_should_reissue_outstanding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 82 ++++++++++------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index f827c2ef00a9..37a0cb8011c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> @@ -122,15 +122,6 @@ struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu {
> */
> #define UBLK_IO_FLAG_OWNED_BY_SRV 0x02
>
> -/*
> - * IO command is aborted, so this flag is set in case of
> - * !UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE.
> - *
> - * After this flag is observed, any pending or new incoming request
> - * associated with this io command will be failed immediately
> - */
> -#define UBLK_IO_FLAG_ABORTED 0x04
> -
> /*
> * UBLK_IO_FLAG_NEED_GET_DATA is set because IO command requires
> * get data buffer address from ublksrv.
> @@ -1083,12 +1074,6 @@ static inline void __ublk_complete_rq(struct request *req)
> unsigned int unmapped_bytes;
> blk_status_t res = BLK_STS_OK;
>
> - /* called from ublk_abort_queue() code path */
> - if (io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ABORTED) {
> - res = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> - goto exit;
> - }
> -
> /* failed read IO if nothing is read */
> if (!io->res && req_op(req) == REQ_OP_READ)
> io->res = -EIO;
> @@ -1138,47 +1123,6 @@ static void ublk_complete_rq(struct kref *ref)
> __ublk_complete_rq(req);
> }
>
> -static void ublk_do_fail_rq(struct request *req)
> -{
> - struct ublk_queue *ubq = req->mq_hctx->driver_data;
> -
> - if (ublk_nosrv_should_reissue_outstanding(ubq->dev))
> - blk_mq_requeue_request(req, false);
> - else
> - __ublk_complete_rq(req);
> -}
> -
> -static void ublk_fail_rq_fn(struct kref *ref)
> -{
> - struct ublk_rq_data *data = container_of(ref, struct ublk_rq_data,
> - ref);
> - struct request *req = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(data);
> -
> - ublk_do_fail_rq(req);
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Since ublk_rq_task_work_cb always fails requests immediately during
> - * exiting, __ublk_fail_req() is only called from abort context during
> - * exiting. So lock is unnecessary.
> - *
> - * Also aborting may not be started yet, keep in mind that one failed
> - * request may be issued by block layer again.
> - */
> -static void __ublk_fail_req(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct ublk_io *io,
> - struct request *req)
> -{
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE);
> -
> - if (ublk_need_req_ref(ubq)) {
> - struct ublk_rq_data *data = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
> -
> - kref_put(&data->ref, ublk_fail_rq_fn);
> - } else {
> - ublk_do_fail_rq(req);
> - }
> -}
> -
> static void ubq_complete_io_cmd(struct ublk_io *io, int res,
> unsigned issue_flags)
> {
> @@ -1670,10 +1614,26 @@ static void ublk_commit_completion(struct ublk_device *ub,
> ublk_put_req_ref(ubq, req);
> }
>
> +static void __ublk_fail_req(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct ublk_io *io,
> + struct request *req)
> +{
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(io->flags & UBLK_IO_FLAG_ACTIVE);
> +
> + if (ublk_nosrv_should_reissue_outstanding(ubq->dev))
> + blk_mq_requeue_request(req, false);
> + else {
> + io->res = -EIO;
> + __ublk_complete_rq(req);
> + }
> +}
> +
> /*
> - * Called from ubq_daemon context via cancel fn, meantime quiesce ublk
> - * blk-mq queue, so we are called exclusively with blk-mq and ubq_daemon
> - * context, so everything is serialized.
> + * Called from ublk char device release handler, when any uring_cmd is
> + * done, meantime request queue is "quiesced" since all inflight requests
> + * can't be completed because ublk server is dead.
> + *
> + * So no one can hold our request IO reference any more, simply ignore the
> + * reference, and complete the request immediately
> */
> static void ublk_abort_queue(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
> {
> @@ -1690,10 +1650,8 @@ static void ublk_abort_queue(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
> * will do it
> */
> rq = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(ub->tag_set.tags[ubq->q_id], i);
> - if (rq && blk_mq_request_started(rq)) {
> - io->flags |= UBLK_IO_FLAG_ABORTED;
> + if (rq && blk_mq_request_started(rq))
> __ublk_fail_req(ubq, io, rq);
> - }
> }
> }
> }
> --
> 2.47.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-14 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-14 11:25 [PATCH 0/9] ublk: simplify & improve IO canceling Ming Lei
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 1/9] ublk: don't try to stop disk if ->ub_disk is NULL Ming Lei
2025-04-14 19:44 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-15 1:32 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 2/9] ublk: properly serialize all FETCH_REQs Ming Lei
2025-04-14 19:58 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-14 20:39 ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-14 20:52 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-14 21:00 ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-15 1:40 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-16 1:13 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-16 1:17 ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-16 2:04 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-16 1:04 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 3/9] ublk: add ublk_force_abort_dev() Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:06 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 4/9] ublk: rely on ->canceling for dealing with ublk_nosrv_dev_should_queue_io Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:15 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-15 1:48 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 5/9] ublk: move device reset into ublk_ch_release() Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:29 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-15 1:50 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 6/9] ublk: improve detection and handling of ublk server exit Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:36 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-15 1:54 ` Ming Lei
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 7/9] ublk: remove __ublk_quiesce_dev() Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:37 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 8/9] ublk: simplify aborting ublk request Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:42 ` Uday Shankar [this message]
2025-04-14 11:25 ` [PATCH 9/9] selftests: ublk: add generic_06 for covering fault inject Ming Lei
2025-04-14 20:44 ` Uday Shankar
2025-04-15 1:57 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z/1zK7ycY+iLZBmL@dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com \
--to=ushankar@purestorage.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=csander@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).