From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6F19189521; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:46:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734425162; cv=none; b=rDq0gj2vxrstzbf2IkOgPV2hgONIqfAQ0nHOL0MvpzEZVESx3S5pIq/oaY+zEsyqh6YaiwkCQxnWIHJxSiZB+zAz11kjbcSmc7HdQCKj/H/ybVoAYZek10yZ1ZZO9C6iEiRrVZID5oo91wAlIbPMJ/eR5qmGTKaoTA5qQ9lBYbE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734425162; c=relaxed/simple; bh=v0wC3EmDzpJ5rtXafBHFBqZKn7QcVsaUP5J66gQcMuw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IhAmnyxzXsu74aq9Vp+eD9Ov0e0E5cA6t3nvjz8ZfXDAD3qfRgXMTx5iVA/a43u3P7pTsztAvYFWyjy67Xdnoz9qfRS6aK4v2XWlbzj4pyqeapfSTUA8sEAlIAABKUSIAFenohpmfRhTO8JPABGzf0Xa3gBn0nvS4iGmnrPeJyo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fEavuovh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fEavuovh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02854C4CED3; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:46:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1734425162; bh=v0wC3EmDzpJ5rtXafBHFBqZKn7QcVsaUP5J66gQcMuw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fEavuovhwjHO+ZZ0Py9ypSfjFfDpa+JdH1qIR9ziSDjwRQKltKQQ4yjkNgNX8l533 /HJIs4AY3QczC2FyeY//hFrWlyfe6zQxWdEjNUoiC65UeWDsWYwkCEtRn1UvdInDrO sd/O3wkn3Fmor7YIo+6KY9VstidnT4T6u+zp0CD5bzrkXsB6eDCyBLLLHI2BIM5Yee FxbBO3f8M+UCXwC/p3+CAqeT/v+ufHsPXIqm/aZQIi6M7u5SrHeXfuWeBa8bSDAxCb U1wzr96CE4TDscWUcJjkJ0Rq101cxHKBS525V3ZdGU78T7pr4gdckN3G1zfPKzwPiu 1WDUlgpRgmonQ== Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:46:00 -0800 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: hch@lst.de, hare@suse.de, dave@stgolabs.net, david@fromorbit.com, djwong@kernel.org, john.g.garry@oracle.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com, kbusch@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com, p.raghav@samsung.com, da.gomez@samsung.com, kernel@pankajraghav.com Subject: Re: [RFC v2 02/11] fs/buffer: add a for_each_bh() for block_read_full_folio() Message-ID: References: <20241214031050.1337920-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20241214031050.1337920-3-mcgrof@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: So all XFS failures were due to flaky tests and failures, reproducible on the baseline. Luis