linux-block.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	nbd@other.debian.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] block: don't update BLK_FEAT_POLL in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 18:31:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z35T8xeLxhXe-zAS@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250108092520.1325324-4-hch@lst.de>

On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 10:25:00AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> When __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues changes the number of tag sets, it
> might have to disable poll queues.  Currently it does so by adjusting
> the BLK_FEAT_POLL, which is a bit against the intent of features that
> describe hardware / driver capabilities, but more importantly causes
> nasty lock order problems with the broadly held freeze when updating the
> number of hardware queues and the limits lock.  Fix this by leaving
> BLK_FEAT_POLL alone, and instead check for the number of poll queues in
> the bio submission and poll handlers.  While this adds extra work to the
> fast path, the variables are in cache lines used by these operations
> anyway, so it should be cheap enough.
> 
> Fixes: 8023e144f9d6 ("block: move the poll flag to queue_limits")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
...

>  /**
>   * submit_bio_noacct - re-submit a bio to the block device layer for I/O
>   * @bio:  The bio describing the location in memory and on the device.
> @@ -805,8 +817,7 @@ void submit_bio_noacct(struct bio *bio)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!(q->limits.features & BLK_FEAT_POLL) &&
> -			(bio->bi_opf & REQ_POLLED)) {
> +	if ((bio->bi_opf & REQ_POLLED) && !bdev_can_poll(bdev)) {

submit_bio_noacct() is called without grabbing .q_usage_counter,
so tagset may be freed now, then use-after-free on q->tag_set?


Thanks,
Ming


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-08 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-08  9:24 fix queue freeze and limit locking order v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08  9:24 ` [PATCH 01/10] block: fix docs for freezing of queue limits updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:19   ` Ming Lei
2025-01-13  7:19   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-08  9:24 ` [PATCH 02/10] block: add a queue_limits_commit_update_frozen helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:20   ` Ming Lei
2025-01-13  7:20   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-08  9:25 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: don't update BLK_FEAT_POLL in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:17   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-08 10:31   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-01-08 15:27     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09  0:05       ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-09  2:18         ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08 10:54   ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-13  7:23   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-08  9:25 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: add a store_limit operations for sysfs entries Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:33   ` Ming Lei
2025-01-13  7:24   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-08  9:25 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order in sysfs store methods Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:18   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-08 10:38   ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08 15:29     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13  7:25   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-08  9:25 ` [PATCH 06/10] nvme: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:39   ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08  9:25 ` [PATCH 07/10] nbd: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:40   ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08  9:25 ` [PATCH 08/10] usb-storage: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:41   ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08  9:25 ` [PATCH 09/10] loop: refactor queue limits updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:20   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-08 10:42   ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08 10:56   ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-08  9:25 ` [PATCH 10/10] loop: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:20   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-08 10:44   ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08 10:57   ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-08 10:51 ` fix queue freeze and limit locking order v2 Johannes Thumshirn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z35T8xeLxhXe-zAS@fedora \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
    --cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).