From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
nbd@other.debian.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order in sysfs store methods
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 18:38:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z35Vl6ob0zLH_Kh-@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250108092520.1325324-6-hch@lst.de>
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 10:25:02AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> queue_attr_store() always freezes a device queue before calling the
> attribute store operation. For attributes that control queue limits, the
> store operation will also lock the queue limits with a call to
> queue_limits_start_update(). However, some drivers (e.g. SCSI sd) may
> need to issue commands to a device to obtain limit values from the
> hardware with the queue limits locked. This creates a potential ABBA
> deadlock situation if a user attempts to modify a limit (thus freezing
> the device queue) while the device driver starts a revalidation of the
> device queue limits.
>
> Avoid such deadlock by not freezing the queue before calling the
> ->store_limit() method in struct queue_sysfs_entry and instead use the
> queue_limits_commit_update_frozen helper to freeze the queue after taking
> the limits lock.
>
> (commit log adapted from a similar patch from Damien Le Moal)
>
> Fixes: ff956a3be95b ("block: use queue_limits_commit_update in queue_discard_max_store")
> Fixes: 0327ca9d53bf ("block: use queue_limits_commit_update in queue_max_sectors_store")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> block/blk-sysfs.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c
> index f36356cbde0b..2de405cb5f10 100644
> --- a/block/blk-sysfs.c
> +++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c
> @@ -691,22 +691,24 @@ queue_attr_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
> if (entry->load_module)
> entry->load_module(disk, page, length);
>
> - mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
> - blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
> if (entry->store_limit) {
> struct queue_limits lim = queue_limits_start_update(q);
>
> res = entry->store_limit(disk, page, length, &lim);
Looks fine, but now ->store_limit() is called without holding
->sysfs_lock, maybe it should be documented.
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-08 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-08 9:24 fix queue freeze and limit locking order v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 9:24 ` [PATCH 01/10] block: fix docs for freezing of queue limits updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:19 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-13 7:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-08 9:24 ` [PATCH 02/10] block: add a queue_limits_commit_update_frozen helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:20 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-13 7:20 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-08 9:25 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: don't update BLK_FEAT_POLL in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:17 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-08 10:31 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08 15:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 0:05 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-09 2:18 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08 10:54 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-13 7:23 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-08 9:25 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: add a store_limit operations for sysfs entries Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:33 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-13 7:24 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-08 9:25 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order in sysfs store methods Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:18 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-08 10:38 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-01-08 15:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-13 7:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-08 9:25 ` [PATCH 06/10] nvme: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:39 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08 9:25 ` [PATCH 07/10] nbd: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:40 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08 9:25 ` [PATCH 08/10] usb-storage: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:41 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08 9:25 ` [PATCH 09/10] loop: refactor queue limits updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:20 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-08 10:42 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08 10:56 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-08 9:25 ` [PATCH 10/10] loop: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-08 10:20 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-01-08 10:44 ` Ming Lei
2025-01-08 10:57 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-01-08 10:51 ` fix queue freeze and limit locking order v2 Johannes Thumshirn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z35Vl6ob0zLH_Kh-@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).