From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E989B1F8670 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 10:43:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736332997; cv=none; b=j1yhC3ncQLN/FJvvl50EaYyA4Wxr0yFE+Fi0/A9Y7PXOtiYNF34Y6or5QzBXx8IHCMyWkUv+7YgabwaqNFWqQdTzoaMOaukBB6u5USfAf/2F5peYnBUrOJzWZI+zGyXOQikuaseKuDndeTU1ZwMYU9B3FaUAnG2cGZDVueiOpFY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736332997; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fHIqk2pWSYBiQzqYIBxmBCn/NkCybawmeeZVS2FAi/8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=BNaPd4KV9+h2eh+7W3RyV2QgibX9pQcvG2xHKj1D5twhek5uV2CxOSqC3TmXkH3nvCVjmYKCLAdfM7Yng+pyrAYENg308HjRugItw7oQUUGVibtNjSE4szWle6ebHudvC0nV0g8xwHwVbrqpi3X87Feu+CuXKTko0Nk0+38/pDI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=I12FV0S7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="I12FV0S7" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1736332994; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GLX9dDlTVgmbVGGd6/BeEkeXDnHYku8g8v3tdeUuyVA=; b=I12FV0S7J9lW30FCiif9UMAtu+USr+iFGm51YZz5F69IZ2bB4GFSv1oCNoHH+QFztfEWMo bTLXI4wD2q6JH2LGnSyikkAlUZX45RfWdBEc9MfgMEwV6exdHEfS/80CtHUC2t3vcd2D5w 9dhWmWF9pocGgnnsy8yDXr4n0W0oyD4= Received: from mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-370-IIXNRp38NQayN-I7ZSObOw-1; Wed, 08 Jan 2025 05:43:08 -0500 X-MC-Unique: IIXNRp38NQayN-I7ZSObOw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: IIXNRp38NQayN-I7ZSObOw Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61EBC1955BED; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 10:43:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora (unknown [10.72.116.74]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D150195608D; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 10:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 18:42:55 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jens Axboe , Damien Le Moal , Nilay Shroff , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, nbd@other.debian.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] loop: refactor queue limits updates Message-ID: References: <20250108092520.1325324-1-hch@lst.de> <20250108092520.1325324-10-hch@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250108092520.1325324-10-hch@lst.de> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 10:25:06AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Replace loop_reconfigure_limits with a slightly less encompassing > loop_update_limits that expects the aller to acquire and commit the > queue limits to prepare for sorting out the freeze vs limits lock > ordering. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Ming Lei Thanks, Ming