From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Broomfield <mattysweeps@google.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ming.lei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: ublk: expose ublk device info in sysfs or support ioctls on ublk-control
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 13:13:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6ZpdKDo7Ao803NP@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALEiSPxGXy5faNFiiPt_tOF=K2cS=02RVdjw1JGuokNV7JPHJw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 11:50:33AM -0800, Matthew Broomfield wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It would be great if there was a sysfs file which exposed "struct
> ublksrv_ctrl_dev_info" so programs written in languages without
> io_uring libraries (such as python) could easily read this information
> for management, testing, or record keeping. Ideally if possible this
> could be something like "/sys/block/ublkbX/ublk_info". Is this
> possible?
>
> Alternatively, the "/dev/ublk-control" file could support ioctls which
> mimic the io_uring cmds such as UBLK_CMD_GET_DEV_INFO,
> UBLK_CMD_ADD_DEV, etc. This would be more powerful as the block device
> lifecycle management program could be completely independent of both
> io_uring and the program which handles the block IO. However I'm
> skeptical it's worth it in the long run to create a ioctl -> io_uring
> adapter. (As opposed to languages natively supporting io_uring)
It's really not that difficult to make an equivalent ioctl from an
existing uring_cmd.
I think it would be even easier if the ioctl was exposed on the
/dev/ublkcX device instead of the general purpose ublk-control. This way
you can just use the path of the device you want to query instead of
having to look up its dev_id.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-07 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-07 19:50 ublk: expose ublk device info in sysfs or support ioctls on ublk-control Matthew Broomfield
2025-02-07 20:13 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2025-02-08 6:03 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6ZpdKDo7Ao803NP@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mattysweeps@google.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox