public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ublk: set_params: properly check if parameters can be applied
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 10:34:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8e4UY-niL16yF2N@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250304-set_params-v1-1-17b5e0887606@purestorage.com>

On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 02:34:26PM -0700, Uday Shankar wrote:
> The parameters set by the set_params call are only applied to the block
> device in the start_dev call. So if a device has already been started, a
> subsequently issued set_params on that device will not have the desired
> effect, and should return an error. There is an existing check for this
> - set_params fails on devices in the LIVE state. But this check is not
> sufficient to cover the recovery case. In this case, the device will be
> in the QUIESCED or FAIL_IO states, so set_params will succeed. But this
> success is misleading, because the parameters will not be applied, since
> the device has already been started (by a previous ublk server). The bit
> UB_STATE_USED is set on completion of the start_dev; use it to detect
> and fail set_params commands which arrive too late to be applied (after
> start_dev).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
> ---
>  drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index 2955900ee713c5d8f3cbc2a69f6f6058348e5253..aa34594c76ad02b1480b9ef4a2bd52a095ca6f3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> @@ -2782,9 +2782,12 @@ static int ublk_ctrl_set_params(struct ublk_device *ub,
>  	if (ph.len > sizeof(struct ublk_params))
>  		ph.len = sizeof(struct ublk_params);
>  
> -	/* parameters can only be changed when device isn't live */
>  	mutex_lock(&ub->mutex);
> -	if (ub->dev_info.state == UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE) {
> +	if (test_bit(UB_STATE_USED, &ub->state)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Parameters can only be changed when device hasn't
> +		 * been started yet
> +		 */
>  		ret = -EACCES;
>  	} else if (copy_from_user(&ub->params, argp, ph.len)) {
>  		ret = -EFAULT;

Good catch,

Fixes: 0aa73170eba5 ("ublk_drv: add SET_PARAMS/GET_PARAMS control command")
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>


Thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-05  2:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-04 21:34 [PATCH] ublk: set_params: properly check if parameters can be applied Uday Shankar
2025-03-05  2:34 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-03-05 14:45 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z8e4UY-niL16yF2N@fedora \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox