From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A11AD1FDE07; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 01:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742691733; cv=none; b=XPn+ZalqhyYBr174R4uEIpjG2RpCDO4mkCFGVCy1H3BJoQnBGycfJEMco4PVs0MVBGnCjThTd/wGEqkRAfec1e3+bTpWc2MmxugqGhkA1svbJL5Jznv5h7eYFRNr+IDgyetTjpeJWY5MH1W298uKwPRqNjHe2L7YSGBYC2DBdkA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742691733; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ksj6kRjx99oAfhdgnyVT4Uj8dlQB6UBKFAwF5s+xPlg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YZvZVLK9ih0Er5Fs8Fh/NyjeI48oTz7s1EJctnDsuaeWB6EFVFiq/U+DNdBWvAic1RfsDurqpEgKoa8kInAal2cJ6OVi6a+CDbt1i92oPLjtbCAcZ+eNRNq4zOQ6kWOmb8fijxPgdMJL+NhsYudf7xzQvSZFsbNsugJkLudyS6s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=CoBLcu/j; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="CoBLcu/j" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8769CC4CEDD; Sun, 23 Mar 2025 01:02:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1742691733; bh=Ksj6kRjx99oAfhdgnyVT4Uj8dlQB6UBKFAwF5s+xPlg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=CoBLcu/jy/tQoEJPKu4zMxzpXJQK+xwszeEO/+RObGT7IVe41R4YLh7oM/1WbG2+C RCu6SXeajWsTP5VqnQ3NDK9v/zYKtWM2bn9az2UWxngflbCe0Si4BJMRfMcJRVJim/ gHVVGEf7cgaKVzBApnrnzpMXK6vzQztobCpuUjrW5RbvxU8ZoKKpN+jIXU+qPWgqHv A4Lw7of4DJ6Ury7X0esaOC62ZhTk5rlpVeQhx6iAhxxDLhuK06CsBmldeLuYufN4PZ gEWzErqKBdElrxe5P+ToGo99IHs8/IXf81ppfcCZYb/LTs5d+CDAksSBrR1OHGyyKQ owxGZ31uXdkLw== Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2025 18:02:11 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Johannes Weiner Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Jan Kara , Oliver Sang , David Hildenbrand , Alistair Popple , linux-mm@kvack.org, Christian Brauner , Hannes Reinecke , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, John Garry , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it, Pankaj Raghav , Daniel Gomez , David Bueso Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [block/bdev] 3c20917120: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/util.c Message-ID: References: <20250322231440.GA1894930@cmpxchg.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250322231440.GA1894930@cmpxchg.org> On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 07:14:40PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote: > Hey Luis, > > This looks like the same issue the bot reported here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250321135524.GA1888695@cmpxchg.org/ > > There is a fix for it queued in next-20250318 and later. Could you > please double check with your reproducer against a more recent next? Confirmed, at least it's been 30 minutes and no crashes now where as before it would crash in 1 minute. I'll let it soak for 2.5 hours in the hopes I can trigger the warning originally reported by this thread. Even though from code inspection I see how the kernel warning would trigger I just want to force trigger it on a test, and I can't yet. Luis