From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CB203595E; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 05:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741755724; cv=none; b=K8iDY6dPxpScEZBd7eEcezZ9VsZp+oWqKo6iwkZ6nLgzyHusMIPfBcTVIsoTLv5+WxpbqAwrrGawuRPEJTzcYgM836dcxlPnIV7C9obJjq4s19GrN9aflc6JxxLxFdlCX6jxG3Qez6JSo9SVmqcL5Ldt99LT0U/14zevFm2Sukg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741755724; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bq8xGoNfIm85Y5PQEZeKLy6enCpMHIQM0jHtMjVf+yw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=DyaJhPgPnoHTJjaeaLNWY8djBXdgplaDnpGnzskwHT6UZBLlhITHXrbtWA6M7nCbx/udmRe9BlLjQ9t/R2GkTl2TBPT72eyxtBOImucskRSGwLgDQcC9lgApuW3zoN3xTIHMOSKHTzsQvgLi29irQjLy4OouqA1FbGzs67AoDiY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GVn4q/sY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GVn4q/sY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5825C4CEE3; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 05:02:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1741755723; bh=bq8xGoNfIm85Y5PQEZeKLy6enCpMHIQM0jHtMjVf+yw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GVn4q/sYV9ylcQQ31hsGpw0eMpmeanMZUqHnpJoQ0wnxN7zdqdU3uOaohnfM4iIcE 8AGQQAW9qhI6tbXyb0gu9rG7UsAx8JhOhPx94EaELtYxwfANWlkUC0Nuxqoz12HmJR Jfv/zgE2n6KR6FC5IFc125rbt95brsVtWKwhSNnxAQVSKhbfPP5qvTzO0y5FDRn+Di 38Z2RNFDfeIxg45vLKE1OYqQ5ctzgWSuckmG+z+Yr+ZVL0TKFE7v0IeMcO4vuXaxSa RAV48IEdHBEHxlbYte5dofl38JpMVtQiymzPYFQeJ6Gxgu7DfGfyQtRAXn0MH54V4h mstL2vDpLVJxg== Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 22:02:02 -0700 From: Luis Chamberlain To: Christian Brauner Cc: kernel test robot , Hannes Reinecke , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , John Garry , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ltp@lists.linux.it Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [block/bdev] 3c20917120: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/util.c Message-ID: References: <202503101536.27099c77-lkp@intel.com> <20250311-testphasen-behelfen-09b950bbecbf@brauner> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250311-testphasen-behelfen-09b950bbecbf@brauner> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 01:10:43PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 03:43:49PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > kernel test robot noticed "BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/util.c" on: > > > > commit: 3c20917120ce61f2a123ca0810293872f4c6b5a4 ("block/bdev: enable large folio support for large logical block sizes") > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > > Is this also already fixed by: > > commit a64e5a596067 ("bdev: add back PAGE_SIZE block size validation for sb_set_blocksize()") Or this patch just posted: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250312050028.1784117-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Luis