* [PATCH] block: fix adding folio to bio
@ 2025-03-12 11:38 Ming Lei
2025-03-12 12:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2025-03-12 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe, linux-block
Cc: Ming Lei, Kundan Kumar, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle),
Christoph Hellwig, Luis Chamberlain, Gavin Shan
>4GB folio is possible on some ARCHs, such as aarch64, 16GB hugepage
is supported, then 'offset' of folio can't be held in 'unsigned int',
cause warning in bio_add_folio_nofail() and IO failure.
Fix it by adjusting 'page' & 'offset' so that 'offset' can be stored
in 'unsigned int'.
Fixes: ed9832bc08db ("block: introduce folio awareness and add a bigger size from folio")
Cc: Kundan Kumar <kundan.kumar@samsung.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
block/bio.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bio.c b/block/bio.c
index f0c416e5931d..dd61d783717f 100644
--- a/block/bio.c
+++ b/block/bio.c
@@ -1026,9 +1026,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_add_page);
void bio_add_folio_nofail(struct bio *bio, struct folio *folio, size_t len,
size_t off)
{
+ struct page *page = &folio->page;
+
WARN_ON_ONCE(len > UINT_MAX);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(off > UINT_MAX);
- __bio_add_page(bio, &folio->page, len, off);
+ if (unlikely(off > UINT_MAX)) {
+ unsigned long nr = off / PAGE_SIZE;
+
+ page = folio_page(folio, nr);
+ off -= nr * PAGE_SIZE;
+ }
+
+ __bio_add_page(bio, page, len, off);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bio_add_folio_nofail);
--
2.47.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] block: fix adding folio to bio
2025-03-12 11:38 [PATCH] block: fix adding folio to bio Ming Lei
@ 2025-03-12 12:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-03-12 14:02 ` Ming Lei
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2025-03-12 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ming Lei
Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-block, Kundan Kumar, Christoph Hellwig,
Luis Chamberlain, Gavin Shan
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 07:38:05PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> +++ b/block/bio.c
> @@ -1026,9 +1026,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_add_page);
> void bio_add_folio_nofail(struct bio *bio, struct folio *folio, size_t len,
> size_t off)
> {
> + struct page *page = &folio->page;
> +
> WARN_ON_ONCE(len > UINT_MAX);
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(off > UINT_MAX);
> - __bio_add_page(bio, &folio->page, len, off);
> + if (unlikely(off > UINT_MAX)) {
I think we should probably make this:
if (unlikely(off + len > UINT_MAX))
because I'm not sure that everything will cope well with an I/O that
crosses the 4GB boundary.
Actually, why bother with the conditional? Let's just do it always.
{
+ unsigned long nr = off / PAGE_SIZE;
WARN_ON_ONCE(len > UINT_MAX);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(off > UINT_MAX);
- __bio_add_page(bio, &folio->page, len, off);
+ off = off % PAGE_SIZE;
+ __bio_add_page(bio, folio_page(folio, nr), len, off);
}
Also you need to do bio_add_folio(), not just the _nofail variant.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] block: fix adding folio to bio
2025-03-12 12:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
@ 2025-03-12 14:02 ` Ming Lei
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2025-03-12 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Wilcox
Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-block, Kundan Kumar, Christoph Hellwig,
Luis Chamberlain, Gavin Shan
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 12:19:12PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 07:38:05PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > +++ b/block/bio.c
> > @@ -1026,9 +1026,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_add_page);
> > void bio_add_folio_nofail(struct bio *bio, struct folio *folio, size_t len,
> > size_t off)
> > {
> > + struct page *page = &folio->page;
> > +
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(len > UINT_MAX);
> > - WARN_ON_ONCE(off > UINT_MAX);
> > - __bio_add_page(bio, &folio->page, len, off);
> > + if (unlikely(off > UINT_MAX)) {
>
> I think we should probably make this:
>
> if (unlikely(off + len > UINT_MAX))
>
> because I'm not sure that everything will cope well with an I/O that
> crosses the 4GB boundary.
If hardware doesn't support it, the bio will be splitted before submitting
to the disk, so I think the check isn't needed here.
>
> Actually, why bother with the conditional? Let's just do it always.
>
> {
> + unsigned long nr = off / PAGE_SIZE;
> WARN_ON_ONCE(len > UINT_MAX);
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(off > UINT_MAX);
> - __bio_add_page(bio, &folio->page, len, off);
> + off = off % PAGE_SIZE;
> + __bio_add_page(bio, folio_page(folio, nr), len, off);
> }
>
> Also you need to do bio_add_folio(), not just the _nofail variant.
OK, will cover bio_add_folio() in V2 by the unconditional way.
Thanks,
Ming
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-03-12 14:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-03-12 11:38 [PATCH] block: fix adding folio to bio Ming Lei
2025-03-12 12:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-03-12 14:02 ` Ming Lei
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox