From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] block: Allow REQ_FUA|REQ_READ
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 23:01:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9kMHlFfr1gJDPyS@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fhhgjnhmk72vpruhgftwq3lzfmylbhn6cuajj6saikee2zuqjp@54yfyxu35yiz>
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 08:15:51AM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 11:00:20PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 02:41:33PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > That's the sort of thing that process is supposed to avoid. To be clear,
> > > you and Christoph are the two reasons I've had to harp on process in the
> > > past - everyone else in the kernel has been fine.
>
> ...
>
> > In this case you very clearly misunderstood how the FUA bit works on
> > reads (and clearly documented that misunderstanding in the commit log).
>
> FUA reads are clearly documented in the NVME spec.
They are, and the semantics are as multiple people pointed out very
different from what you claim they are in the commit message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-18 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-11 20:15 [PATCH 00/14] better handling of checksum errors/bitrot Kent Overstreet
2025-03-11 20:15 ` [PATCH 13/14] block: Allow REQ_FUA|REQ_READ Kent Overstreet
2025-03-15 16:47 ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-15 17:01 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-15 17:03 ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-15 17:27 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-15 17:43 ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-15 18:07 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-15 18:32 ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-15 18:41 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17 12:15 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 14:13 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-17 14:49 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 15:15 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-17 15:22 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 15:30 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-03-17 15:43 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 17:57 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-03-17 18:21 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 19:24 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-17 19:40 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 20:39 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-17 21:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-18 1:06 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-18 6:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 17:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-18 18:00 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-18 18:10 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-18 18:13 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-20 5:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-20 10:28 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-18 0:27 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-18 6:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 21:33 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 17:32 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-18 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 6:01 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-03-17 20:55 ` [PATCH 00/14] better handling of checksum errors/bitrot John Stoffel
2025-03-18 1:15 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-18 14:47 ` John Stoffel
2025-03-20 17:15 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9kMHlFfr1gJDPyS@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox