public inbox for linux-block@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] block: Allow REQ_FUA|REQ_READ
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:10:49 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9m3KSGxyt_HQ5oD@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <t4zch7xnj5j3ifnivw3fkhkjpjldk2mozk3ouhogi224ntalab@3jjt2j6crbxe>

On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 02:00:13PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> It's certainly not in dispute that read fua is a documented, legitimate
> command, so there's no reason for the block layer to be rejecting it.
> 
> Whether it has exactly the behaviour we want isn't a critical issue that
> has to be determined right now. The starting point for that will be to
> test device behaviour (with some simple performance tests, like I
> mentioned), and anyways it's outside the scope of the block layer.

Maybe just change the commit log. Read FUA has legit uses for persisting
data as described by the specs. No need to introduce contested behavior
to justify this patch, yah?

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-18 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-11 20:15 [PATCH 00/14] better handling of checksum errors/bitrot Kent Overstreet
2025-03-11 20:15 ` [PATCH 13/14] block: Allow REQ_FUA|REQ_READ Kent Overstreet
2025-03-15 16:47   ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-15 17:01     ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-15 17:03       ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-15 17:27         ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-15 17:43           ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-15 18:07             ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-15 18:32               ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-15 18:41                 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17  6:00                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17 12:15                     ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 14:13                       ` Keith Busch
2025-03-17 14:49                         ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 15:15                           ` Keith Busch
2025-03-17 15:22                             ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 15:30                         ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-03-17 15:43                           ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 17:57                             ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-03-17 18:21                               ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 19:24                                 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-17 19:40                                   ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 20:39                                     ` Keith Busch
2025-03-17 21:13                                       ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-18  1:06                                         ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-18  6:16                                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 17:49                                           ` Bart Van Assche
2025-03-18 18:00                                             ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-18 18:10                                               ` Keith Busch [this message]
2025-03-18 18:13                                                 ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-20  5:40                                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-20 10:28                                                   ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-18  0:27                                       ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-18  6:11                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 21:33                                   ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-17 17:32                           ` Keith Busch
2025-03-18  6:19                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18  6:01                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-17 20:55 ` [PATCH 00/14] better handling of checksum errors/bitrot John Stoffel
2025-03-18  1:15   ` Kent Overstreet
2025-03-18 14:47     ` John Stoffel
2025-03-20 17:15       ` Kent Overstreet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z9m3KSGxyt_HQ5oD@kbusch-mbp \
    --to=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox